...
首页> 外文期刊>Roads & bridges >DELAYS VS. ACCELERATION
【24h】

DELAYS VS. ACCELERATION

机译:DELAYS VS. ACCELERATION

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Project required relocation of several overhead and underground utilities within the right of way. Some third-parties took an extra three months to relocate their utilities. Liquidated damages for late completion were set at over $4,000 per day. The contractor submitted a claim for delays seeking a 187-time extension and time-related costs for the same. The contractor submitted a separate claim for acceleration seeking its costs to speed up performance striving to meet the completion deadlines. One problem for the contractor was a contract provision that waived damages for delay - a No-Damages-for-Delay (ND4D) provision, stating "[i]t is understood and agreed that... no additional compensation will be allowed for delays, inconvenience, or damages sustained by [contractor] due to any interference from the said utility appurtenances or the operation of moving them." Under Maryland law, ND4D clauses are enforceable unless there is intentional wrongdoing, gross negligence, fraud, or misrepresentation by the public agency. Although it was undisputed that the utility relocation was delayed and without the contractor's fault, the ND4D clause precluded the contractor's recovery of compensation for delays since none of the exceptions applied. The contractor could not recover its time-related costs, such as, extended site overhead and home office overhead.

著录项

  • 来源
    《Roads & bridges》 |2022年第8期|11-11|共1页
  • 作者

    Jon Straw;

  • 作者单位

    Kraftson Caudle, PLC, a law firm in McLean, Va.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号