Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health–Supported Relative Citation Ratio Among Fellowship-Trained American Orthopaedic Joint Reconstruction Surgery Faculty: A New Bibliometric Measure of Scientific Influence

Pizzo D.M.; Imam N.; Sudah S.Y.Faccone R.D.Akinrodoye M.Manzi J.E.Menendez M.E.Gesell M.W.

首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health–Supported Relative Citation Ratio Among Fellowship-Trained American Orthopaedic Joint Reconstruction Surgery Faculty: A New Bibliometric Measure of Scientific Influence

【24h】

Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health–Supported Relative Citation Ratio Among Fellowship-Trained American Orthopaedic Joint Reconstruction Surgery Faculty: A New Bibliometric Measure of Scientific Influence

机译：Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health–Supported Relative Citation Ratio Among Fellowship-Trained American Orthopaedic Joint Reconstruction Surgery Faculty: A New Bibliometric Measure of Scientific Influence

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相关主题

摘要

? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Background: The relative citation ratio (RCR), a novel National Institutes of Health–Supported measure of research productivity, allows for accurate interdisciplinary comparison of publication influence. This study evaluates the RCR of fellowship-trained adult reconstructive orthopaedic surgeons with the goal of analyzing potentially influential physician demographics. Methods: Adult Reconstruction Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education fellowship-trained faculty for orthopaedic residency programs were identified via departmental websites. The National Institutes of Health's iCite database was retrospectively reviewed for mean RCR, weighted RCR, and publication count by surgeon. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and analyses of variance testing to compare sex, career length, academic rank, and professional degrees in addition to an MD or DO. Significance was considered P <.05. Results: A total of 488 fellowship-trained adult reconstruction faculty from 144 programs were included in the analysis. Overall, the faculty recorded a median RCR of 1.65 (interquartile range: 1.01-2.28) and a median weighted RCR of 16.59 (interquartile range: 3.98-61.92). The weighted RCR and total number of publications were associated with academic rank and career longevity, while the mean RCR was associated with academic rank. The median RCR ranged from 1.12 to 1.87 for all subgroups. Conclusion: Adult reconstruction faculty are exceptionally productive and generate highly impactful studies as evidenced by the high median RCR value relative to the National Institutes of Health standard value of 1.0. Our data have important implications in the assessment of grant outcomes, promotion, and continued evaluation of research influence within the hip and knee community.

著录项

来源
《The Journal of arthroplasty》 |2023年第1期|165-170|共6页
作者
Pizzo D.M.; Imam N.; Sudah S.Y.Faccone R.D.Akinrodoye M.Manzi J.E.Menendez M.E.Gesell M.W.;
展开▼
作者单位

Orthopaedic Surgery Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School;

Orthopaedic Surgery Monmouth Medical Center;

Research Alabama College of Osteopathic MedicineWeill Cornell Medical CollegeOrthopaedic Surgery Rush University Medical Center;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种英语
中图分类骨科学（运动系疾病、矫形外科学）;
关键词
adult reconstructive orthopaedic surgery; faculty; orthopaedic surgery; publication impact; RCR;

Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health–Supported Relative Citation Ratio Among Fellowship-Trained American Orthopaedic Joint Reconstruction Surgery Faculty: A New Bibliometric Measure of Scientific Influence

摘要

著录项

相关主题

期刊订阅