...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Policy complementary or policy crowding-out? Effects of cross-instrumental policy mix on green innovation in China
【24h】

Policy complementary or policy crowding-out? Effects of cross-instrumental policy mix on green innovation in China

机译：Policy complementary or policy crowding-out? Effects of cross-instrumental policy mix on green innovation in China

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

Stimulating innovation and encouraging green development require different policy instruments, implying that an effective combination of these instruments is critical for achieving green innovation. The paper evaluates the combined impact of innovation and environmental policies. Taking the combination of China's Innovative City Pilot (ICP) and Low-carbon City Pilot (LCP) policies as an example, it investigates whether their impact on green innovation is complementary. Results show that the ICP and LCP policies can promote urban green innovation, with a net impact of about 12 and 7 , respectively. However, the two policies can also crowd each other out, as the ICP policy may substitute for the effect of the LCP policy. Furthermore, this crowding-out effect is more prominent in cities with low administrative levels, of Class I size, and without high-speed rail. The empirical evidence indicates that this cross-instrumental mix fails to produce the desirable policy complementarity and suggests that policymakers looking to support green innovation should carefully coordinate their implementation of environmental and innovation policies.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号