...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology practice. >Editorial Commentaries
【24h】

Editorial Commentaries

机译:Editorial Commentaries

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Banti and colleagues hereby report a relevant and interesting study on a usually overlooked aspect of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, the cost implications (and potential cost savings) of routine preoperative blood typing and crossmatching. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study of 804 patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy, the authors found that only 9 patients (1.1) required a transfusion, with a maximum of 2 blood units needed. The authors identified a significant difference in R.E.N.A.L. (for radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar line) nephrometry score and operative blood loss between the transfused and nontransfused groups. These findings are both intuitive and interesting, as complex tumors are more likely to require difficult dissection techniques and advanced reconstructions, usually the situations in which bleeding occurs. In this series, almost all patients had stage pT1 tumors and vascular control was mostly artery-only clamping, which is the usual technique done in most centers.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号