首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiac surgery. >Erector spinae plane block as perioperative analgesia for midline sternotomy in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
【24h】

Erector spinae plane block as perioperative analgesia for midline sternotomy in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

机译:Erector spinae plane block as perioperative analgesia for midline sternotomy in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Inadequate analgesia following cardiac surgery increases postoperative complications. Opioid‐based analgesia is associated with side effects that may compromise postoperative recovery. Regional anesthetic techniques provide an alternative thereby reducing opioid requirements and potentially enhancing postoperative recovery. The erector spinae plane block has been used in multiple surgical procedures including sternotomy for cardiac surgery. We, therefore, aimed to characterize the impact of this block on post‐sternotomy pain and recovery in cardiac surgery patients. Methods We conducted an electronic search for studies reporting on the use of the erector spinae plane block in adult cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case‐control studies were considered for inclusion. Outcomes of interest included postoperative pain, time‐to‐extubation, and intensive care unit length of stay. Results In total, 498 citations were identified and five were included in the meta‐analysis. The erector spinae plane block did not significantly reduce self‐reported postoperative pain scores at 4?h (?2.04; 95 confidence interval CI ?8.15 to 4.07; p?=?.29) or 12?h (?0.27; 95 CI ?2.48 to 1.94; p?=?.65) postextubation, intraoperative opioid requirements (?3.07; 95 CI ?6.25 to 0.11; p?=?.05, time‐to‐extubation (?1.17; 95 CI ?2.81 to 0.46; p?=?.12), or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (?4.51; 95 CI ?14.23 to 5.22; p?=?.24). Conclusions Erector spinae plane block was not associated with significant reduction in postoperative pain, intraoperative opioid requirements, time‐to‐extubation, and ICU length of stay in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The paucity of large randomized controlled trials and the high heterogeneity among studies suggest that further studies are required to assess its effectiveness in cardiac surgery patients.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号