...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry >4E analysis and tri-objective optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle power plant with combustion chamber steam injection to control NOx emission
【24h】

4E analysis and tri-objective optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle power plant with combustion chamber steam injection to control NOx emission

机译:4E analysis and tri-objective optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle power plant with combustion chamber steam injection to control NOx emission

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents a novel triple-pressure combined cycle power plant (CCPP) with a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) configured with heat exchangers of multiple pressure levels, same as the real case. In addition, combustion chamber steam injection is added to the top cycle in order to reduce hazardous emissions. The research investigates energy, exergy, economic, and environmental aspects of the system to initiate sustainable development in said areas. A thorough parametric study is carried out to evaluate the effects of steam injection and other decision variable on emissions and system performance. Then, the total cost rate and the CO2 index are minimized while maximizing the second law efficiency via a tri-objective optimization using the genetic algorithm. The outcome of the economic analysis is that the HRSG has the maximum total cost rate among all the components, namely 0.1673 $/s. The environmental impact assessments indicate that the CO2 and NO emission has considerable molar fractions of 0.035 and 6.88 x 10(-4), respectively. As a result of the tri-objective optimization, a 3D Pareto Frontier is presented, which pointed out the maximum attainable exergy efficiency is 50.32, as well as the minimum total cost rates of 8.04 $/s and CO2 index of 0.34 kg/kWh. Finally, the scatter distribution of major decision variables revealed the optimum range of decision variables in which the optimum points of the Pareto Frontier are obtained. Accordingly, the scatter distribution showed that 46 kg s(-1) is the optimum value for steam injection flow rate in terms of efficiency, cost and emission optimization.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号