• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of neuroscience. >Corticospinal excitability and motor representation after long-term resistance training
【24h】

Corticospinal excitability and motor representation after long-term resistance training

机译：Corticospinal excitability and motor representation after long-term resistance training

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is poorly understood how the central nervous system adapts to resistance training, especially after years of exposure. We compared corticospinal excitability and motor representation assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) between long-term resistance trained (LRT, ≥3 years) versus untrained (UNT) males (n = 15/group). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained from the biceps brachii during isometric elbow flexion. Stimulus-response curves were created at the hotspot during 10 maximum voluntary torque (MVT) contractions. Maximum peak-to-peak MEP amplitude (MEPmax) was acquired with 100 stimulator output intensity, whilst 25-100 MVT was produced. Maps were created during 10 MVT contractions, with an individualised TMS intensity eliciting 20 MEPmax at the hotspot. LRT had a 48 lower stimulus-response curve slope than UNT (p < .05). LRT also had a 66 larger absolute map size, although TMS intensity used for mapping was greater in LRT versus UNT (48 vs. 26 above active motor threshold) to achieve a target 20 MEPmax at the hotspot, due to the lower slope of LRT. Map size was strongly correlated with the TMS intensity used for mapping (r = 0.776, p < .001). Once map size was normalised to TMS intensity, there was no difference between the groups (p = .683). We conclude that LRT had a lower stimulus-response curve slope/excitability, suggesting higher neural efficiency. TMS map size was overwhelmingly determined by TMS intensity, even when the MEP response at the hotspot was matched among individuals, likely due to larger current spread with higher intensities. Motor representation appears similar between LRT and UNT given no difference in the normalised map size.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号