...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >Comparing hemodynamic effects with three different measurement devices, of two methods of external leg compression versus passive leg raising in patients after cardiac surgery.
【24h】

Comparing hemodynamic effects with three different measurement devices, of two methods of external leg compression versus passive leg raising in patients after cardiac surgery.

机译：Comparing hemodynamic effects with three different measurement devices, of two methods of external leg compression versus passive leg raising in patients after cardiac surgery.

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

External leg compression (ELC) may increase cardiac output (CO) in fluid-responsive patients like passive leg raising (PLR). We compared the hemodynamic effects of two methods of ELC and PLR measured by thermodilution (COtd), pressure curve analysis Modelflow? (COmf) and ultra-sound HemoSonic? (COhs), to evaluate the method with the greatest hemodynamic effect and the most accurate less invasive method to measure that effect. We compared hemodynamic effects of two different ELC methods (circular, A (n?=?16), vs. wide, B (n?=?13), bandages inflated to 30?cm H2O for 15?min) with PLR prior to each ELC method, in 29 post-operative cardiac surgical patients. Hemodynamic responses were measured with COtd, COmf and COhs. PLR A increased COtd from 6.1?±?1.7 to 6.3?±?1.8?L·min(-1) (P?=?0.016), and increased COhs from 4.9?±?1.5 to 5.3?±?1.6?L·min(-1) (P?=?0.001), but did not increase COmf. ELC A increased COtd from 6.4?±?1.8 to 6.7?±?1.9?L·min(-1) (P?=?0.001) and COmf from 6.9?±?1.7 to 7.1?±?1.8?L·min(-1) (P?=?0.021), but did not increase COhs. ELC A increased COtd and COmf as in PLR A. PLR B increased COtd from 5.4?±?1.3 to 5.8?±?1.4?L·min(-1) (P?

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号