Abstract:This study was designed to compare the relative merits of soft and rigid artificial ventricles. A cascade mock circulation was used to measure cardiac output under different circumstances. The data show that these soft air driven ventricles show a Starling's–like response over a wider range of filling pressures than identical, but rigid, ventricles. Compression of soft ventricles by high intrathoracic pressures was simulated in vitro. Air pressures up to + 20 mm Hg did not seriously affect soft ventricles. Cardiac tamponade was simulated by compressing the ventricle in a closed fluid compartment. Tamponade became severe when volume reduction of the ventricle rose to 60 ml. Hemolysis caused by soft and rigid ventricles was tested in a blood bag set–up and was 48–82 higher in the rigid ventricle, depending on the driving conditions. Possibly, this could be explained by the authors' finding that rigid ventricles showed a 20 higher intraventriculardP/dtmaxvalue than soft ventricles. Soft ventricles were implanted in three calves as a total artificial heart (TAH). Implantation without quick connectors was easy because the surgeon could easily fold and compress the ventricles. No physiological complications of softness were observed. Blood damage in the animals was low (<5 mg/dl). The authors conclude that soft ventricles show distinct surgical and functional advantages over rigid ventr
展开▼
