AbstractThe computer program, RORA, allows automated analysis of streamflow hydrographs to estimate ground‐water recharge. Output from the program, which is based on the recession‐curve‐displacement method (often referred to as the Rorabaugh method, for whom the program is named), was compared to estimates of recharge obtained from a manual analysis of 156 years of streamflow record from 15 streamflow‐gaging stations in the eastern United States. Statistical tests showed that there was no significant difference between paired estimates of annual recharge by the two methods. Tests of the slopes of best‐fit lines through paired estimates showed that the slopes were not significantly different from unity. Tests of results produced by the four workers who performed the manual method showed that results can differ significantly between workers. Twenty‐two percent of the variation between manual and automated estimates could be attributed to having different workers perform the manual method. The program RORA will produce estimates of recharge equivalent to estimates produced manually, greatly increase the speed of analysis, and reduce the subjectivity inherent in manu
展开▼
