...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Technology Management: The Journal of the Technology Management of Technology, Engineering Management, Technology Policy and Strategy >Why and how do academics bridge the gap between invention and innovation?
【24h】

Why and how do academics bridge the gap between invention and innovation?

机译：为什么学者以及如何弥合发明与创新之间的鸿沟？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although many university inventions and discoveries originating from academia are at a stage beyond basic research, they are yet insufficiently developed to be transformed into innovations without additional research designed to establish proofs of principle (POP) at many levels: technical proof, intellectual property control proof, safety proof, value proof, economic proof and attractiveness proof. Based on the data of a large survey of canadian academics in natural sciences and engineering, the results of this study show that about 20% of the surveyed respondents engaged in different forms of POP despite the absence of incentives to do so. The results also suggest the presence of interdependence (complementarities) between the different forms of POP. Finally, the results show that funding from industry, strong ties with industry and use of services provided by university technology transfer offices are positively associated with the different forms of POP. These results are used to derive policy implications and directions for future research.
机译：尽管许多源自学术界的大学发明和发现尚处于基础研究之外的阶段，但是它们还没有得到足够的发展，无法转化为创新，而没有进行旨在在许多层面建立原理证明（POP）的额外研究：技术证明，知识产权控制证明，安全证明，价值证明，经济证明和吸引力证明。根据对加拿大自然科学和工程学学者进行的一项大规模调查的数据，本研究的结果表明，尽管没有诱因，但仍有约20％的受访者从事不同形式的POP。结果还表明，不同形式的POP之间存在相互依存（互补性）。最后，结果表明，来自行业的资金，与行业的紧密联系以及大学技术转让办公室提供的服务的使用与POP的不同形式呈正相关。这些结果用于得出政策含义和未来研究的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号