...
首页> 外文期刊>statistics in medicine >Differences in morbidity measures and risk factor identification using multiple data sources: The case of coronary heart disease
【24h】

Differences in morbidity measures and risk factor identification using multiple data sources: The case of coronary heart disease

机译:使用多个数据源的发病率测量和危险因素识别的差异:冠心病病例

获取原文
           

摘要

AbstractThe NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study contains several sources of information that can be used to define case status. Incidence rates and relative risks associated with selected, documented risk factors for heart disease were estimated using nine different case definitions. Despite wide variation in the estimates of incidence, the characteristics of the cases were remarkably similar as were the risks associated with heart disease incidence. The main difference occurred when cases were defined on the basis of death certificate information. Cases defined this way are more severe and models based on this definition result in relative risks of greater magnitude.
机译:摘要NHANES I流行病学随访研究包含可用于确定病例状态的几个信息来源。使用九种不同的病例定义估计了与选定的、记录在案的心脏病危险因素相关的发病率和相对风险。尽管发病率估计值差异很大,但这些病例的特征与心脏病发病率相关的风险非常相似。当根据死亡证明信息定义案件时,主要区别就出现了。以这种方式定义的病例更为严重,基于此定义的模型导致相对风险更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号