• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Dimensions >Creating more red tape
【24h】

Creating more red tape

机译：创建更多繁文tape节

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Building Regulatory Reform Advisory Group (BRRAG) was created to recommend improvements to the building permit process. BRRAG identified a need to streamline red tape and equitably distribute liability. Unfortunately, Bill 124 does neither. A review of the information posted on the ministry's own website clearly shows that the new building permit process will actually become more complicated, more costly and more time-consuming (notwithstanding the attempt to impose timeframes on building officials). David Brezer, in his interview with Engineering Dimensions (January/February 2005, pp. 60-61), has now suggested that Bill 124 represents the governments commitment to "public safety." This is surprising since the ministry had repeatedly assured us that neither our engineering competence nor our obligation to public safety has ever been in question and that the objectives of Bill 124 were strictly related to improving the building permitting process.
机译：建立了建筑法规改革咨询小组（BRRAG），以建议对建筑许可程序进行改进。 BRRAG认为有必要简化繁文tape节并公平分配责任。不幸的是，第124号法案没有。对该部自身网站上发布的信息进行的审查清楚地表明，新的建筑许可程序实际上将变得更加复杂，更加昂贵和耗时（尽管试图对建筑官员施加时间限制）。戴维·布雷泽（David Brezer）在接受《工程规模》采访时（2005年1月/ 2月，第60-61页），现在已经提出，第124号法案代表了政府对“公共安全”的承诺。这是令人惊讶的，因为该部一再向我们保证，我们的工程能力和对公共安全的义务从未受到质疑，并且第124号法案的目标与改善建筑许可程序严格相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号