...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of neurology: the official journal of the European Federation of Neurological Societies >High on-treatment platelet reactivity on commonly prescribed antiplatelet agents following transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke: Results from the Trinity Antiplatelet Responsiveness (TRAP) study
【24h】

High on-treatment platelet reactivity on commonly prescribed antiplatelet agents following transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke: Results from the Trinity Antiplatelet Responsiveness (TRAP) study

机译:短暂性脑缺血发作或缺血性中风后,通常处方的抗血小板药对治疗血小板的反应性高:三位一体抗血小板反应性(TRAP)研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and purpose: The prevalence of ex vivo 'high on-treatment platelet reactivity' (HTPR) to antiplatelet regimens in patients with ischaemic cerebrovascular disease (CVD) is uncertain. Methods: HTPR was assessed with PFA-100 collagen-epinephrine (C-EPI) and collagen-ADP (C-ADP) cartridges. Platelet activation (CD62P, CD63 and leucocyte-platelet complex formation) was assessed with whole-blood flow cytometry. Patients were assessed at baseline [≤4 weeks of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ischaemic stroke], and at 14 days and ≥90 days after changing treatment from (i) no medication to aspirin monotherapy (N = 26) or (ii) aspirin to clopidogrel monotherapy (N = 22). HTPR was defined in a novel, 'longitudinal fashion' as failure to prolong relevant closure times compared with the patient's 'baseline value' before he/she underwent an antiplatelet change by more than twice the coefficient of variation of the assay. Results: (i) C-EPI closure times increased at 14 days and 90 days after commencing aspirin (P = 0.002); 24% at 14 days and 18% at 90 days demonstrated HTPR on aspirin. (ii) C-ADP closure times increased at 14 days (P = 0.001) but not 90 days (P = 0.09) after changing from aspirin to clopidogrel; 41% at 14 days, and 35% at 90 days demonstrated HTPR on clopidogrel. Platelet activation was unaffected by aspirin (P = 0.09). The percentage neutrophil-platelet complexes decreased at 14 days (P = 0.02), but this reduction was not maintained 90 days after changing to clopidogrel (P = 0.3). No patient had a recurrent vascular event during prospective follow-up. Conclusions: Longitudinal definitions of HTPR in patients with ischaemic CVD who are undergoing a change in antiplatelet therapy have the potential to provide more clinically meaningful information than traditional 'cross-sectional definitions' of HTPR which are usually based on the comparison of patients' values with those in healthy controls. Using our novel, longitudinal definition of HTPR, the PFA-100 could be used to monitor ex vivo responsiveness to aspirin, and larger, prospective studies are warranted to assess the clinical predictive value of this and other platelet function tests in patients with ischaemic CVD.
机译:背景与目的:缺血性脑血管疾病(CVD)患者中离体“高治疗性血小板反应性”(HTPR)相对于抗血小板治疗的普遍性尚不确定。方法:使用PFA-100胶原蛋白肾上腺素(C-EPI)和胶原蛋白ADP(C-ADP)药筒评估HTPR。用全血流式细胞术评估血小板活化(CD62P,CD63和白细胞-血小板复合物的形成)。在基线[[短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或缺血性中风≤4周],以及将治疗从(i)无药物改为阿司匹林单药治疗(N = 26)或(ii)改变后的第14天和≥90天评估患者阿司匹林至氯吡格雷单一疗法(N = 22)。 HTPR被定义为一种新颖的“纵向方式”,即与患者的“基线值”相比,在他/她进行抗血小板变化之前,未能延长相关的闭合时间超过测定变异系数的两倍。结果:(i)开始使用阿司匹林后14天和90天,C-EPI闭合时间增加(P = 0.002);阿司匹林的HTPR在14天时为24%,在90天时为18%。 (ii)从阿司匹林改为氯吡格雷后,C-ADP封闭时间增加14天(P = 0.001),但没有增加90天(P = 0.09); 14天时41%,90天时35%在氯吡格雷上显示出HTPR。血小板激活不受阿司匹林的影响(P = 0.09)。中性粒细胞-血小板复合物的百分比在14天时下降(P = 0.02),但是在改为氯吡格雷90天后(P = 0.3),这种下降不能保持。在前瞻性随访期间,没有患者复发性血管事件。结论:正在经历抗血小板治疗改变的缺血性CVD患者的HTPR纵向定义比传统的HTPR“横断面定义”(通常基于患者值与以下值的比较)有可能提供更多临床上有意义的信息。健康对照者。使用我们对HTPR的新颖的纵向定义,PFA-100可用于监测离体对阿司匹林的反应性,因此有必要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以评估此和其他血小板功能测试对缺血性CVD患者的临床预测价值。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号