首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Planning >Committee protocol
【24h】

Committee protocol

机译:委员会协议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In June Essex CC further considered the adoption of a new Protocol for the Development and Regulation Committee, and the introduction of public speaking at its meetings. In March the Committee endorsed draft procedures (see Mineral Planning 91 p.24). However, it was necessary to give further consideration in the light of revised guidance published by the Local Government Association on Probity in Planning, and other issues. In May 2002 there was a legal case dealing with, amongst other things, the right to an 'oral' hearing. The Court of Appeal decided a case relating to the development of a new football stadium for Fulham FC, brought by aggrieved local residents challenging why the Secretary of State did not use his powers to call in the application. Amongst other things considered was whether or not there was any real or perceived right to have an oral hearing for the residents' case to be heard. The Court of Appeal concluded that third parties objecting to a planning application had no right to some form of oral hearing before the planning committee of a planning authority.
机译:6月,Essex CC进一步考虑了通过新的发展与监管委员会协议,并在其会议上引入了公众演讲。 3月,委员会核可了程序草案(见《矿物规划》第91页第24页)。但是,有必要根据地方政府规划善意协会发布的修订指南以及其他问题进行进一步考虑。 2002年5月,有一个法律案件涉及“口头”听证权。上诉法院裁定了一个有关为富勒姆足球俱乐部开发新的足球场的案件,该案是由委屈的当地居民提出的,质疑国务卿为何不使用其权力要求该申请。考虑的其他事项之一是,是否有任何真正或被认为有权对居民的案件进行口头听证。上诉法院的结论是,反对规划申请的第三方无权在规划机构的规划委员会进行某种形式的口头听证。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Mineral Planning》 |2002年第92期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 矿物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号