...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>journal of intensive care >A novel risk score for the prediction of airway management in patients with deep neck space abscess: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
【24h】

A novel risk score for the prediction of airway management in patients with deep neck space abscess: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

机译：

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND:Airway management, including noninvasive endotracheal intubation or invasive tracheostomy, is an essential treatment strategy for patients with deep neck space abscess (DNSA) to reverse acute hypoxia, which aids in avoiding acute cerebral hypoxia and cardiac arrest. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel risk score to predict the need for airway management in patients with DNSA.METHODS:Patients with DNSA admitted to 9 hospitals in Guangdong Province between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, were included. The cohort was divided into the training and validation cohorts. The risk score was developed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and logistic regression models in the training cohort. The external validity and diagnostic ability were assessed in the validation cohort.RESULTS:A total of 440 DNSA patients were included, of which 363 (60 required airway management) entered into the training cohort and 77 (13 required airway management) entered into the validation cohort. The risk score included 7 independent predictors (p 0.05): multispace involvement (odd ratio OR 6.42, 95 confidence interval CI 1.79-23.07, p 0.001), gas formation (OR 4.95, 95 CI 2.04-12.00, p 0.001), dyspnea (OR 10.35, 95 CI 3.47-30.89, p 0.001), primary region of infection, neutrophil percentage (OR 1.10, 95 CI 1.02-1.18, p = 0.015), platelet count to lymphocyte count ratio (OR 1.01, 95 CI 1.00-1.01, p = 0.010), and albumin level (OR 0.86, 95 CI 0.80-0.92, p 0.001). Internal validation showed good discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951 (95 CI 0.924-0.971), and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow HL test, p = 0.821). Application of the clinical risk score in the validation cohort also revealed good discrimination (AUC 0.947, 95 CI 0.871-0.985) and calibration (HL test, p = 0.618). Decision curve analyses in both cohorts demonstrated that patients could benefit from this risk score. The score has been transformed into an online calculator that is freely available to the public.CONCLUSIONS:The risk score may help predict a patient's risk of requiring airway management, thus advancing patient safety and supporting appropriate treatment.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号