Mineral Servitudes: Imprescriptible Rights; Louisiana Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: United States Court of Federal Claims

United States Court of Federal Claims

首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Mineral Servitudes: Imprescriptible Rights; Louisiana Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: United States Court of Federal Claims

【24h】

Mineral Servitudes: Imprescriptible Rights; Louisiana Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: United States Court of Federal Claims

机译：矿物奴役：不受限制的权利;路易斯安那州法院的管辖权，程序和审查：美国联邦法院

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

In 1929, the mineral rights in a 100,000-acre tract were conveyed, eventually coming to certain servitude owners, here referred to as Appellants. The land was divided into parcels, designated as Groups A, B, and C. For Groups A and B, the United States Forest Service acquired the lands between 1933 and 1938. After 1941, the United States Army was given use of the lands for military training grounds. The United States prevented or limited the servitude owners from making use of the land for mineral development up until 1978. For Group C, a servitude owner acquired full title to the land, thus terminating the 1929 servitude in 1937. Between 1942 and 1981, he sold parts of Group C to the United States, reserving the minerals in the transactions, and plaintiffs are his successors.

机译：1929年，在100,000英亩的土地上转让了矿产权，最终交给某些奴役权人，这里称为上诉人。土地分为A，B和C组。对于A和B组，美国林业局在1933年至1938年之间获得了这块土地。1941年之后，美国陆军被授予使用这些土地的权利。军事训练场。美国直到1978年为止一直阻止或限制奴隶主使用土地进行矿产开发。对于C组，一个奴隶主获得了该土地的全部所有权，从而在1937年终止了1929年的奴隶制。在1942年至1981年之间，他将C组的一部分出售给美国，保留了交易中的矿物质，而原告是他的继任者。

著录项

来源
《Oil and Gas Reporter》 |2016年第1期|共18页
作者
United States Court of Federal Claims;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类石油、天然气工业;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Mineral Servitudes: Imprescriptible Rights; Louisiana Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: United States Court of Federal Claims [J] . United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Oil and Gas Reporter . 2016,第1期

机译：矿物奴役：不受限制的权利;路易斯安那州法院的管辖权，程序和审查：美国联邦法院
2. Pipelines: Easements; Surface Owner Rights Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Federal Court Jurisdiction [J] . United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Oil and Gas Reporter . 2016,第6期

机译：管道：地役权;地面所有人权利法院的管辖权，程序和审查：联邦法院的管辖权
3. Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Federal Court Jurisdiction; Motion to Remand Environmental Law: Erosion; Wetlands [J] . United States District Court—Eastern District of Louisiana Oil and Gas Reporter . 2017,第6期

机译：法院管辖权，程序和审查：联邦法院管辖权; 搬到环境法的动议：侵蚀; 湿地
4. The Impact of Recent Supreme Court Decisions on Federal Jurisdiction of Streams [C] . Gary E. Freeman World environmental and water resources congress . 2008

机译：最高法院最近判决对联邦河流管辖权的影响
5. Litigating international human rights claims in United States federal courts and the separation of powers dilemma. [D] . Graham, Kenneth Leon. 1999

机译：在美国联邦法院提起的国际人权诉讼，以及三权分立的困境。
6. Fetal rights: Supreme Court tosses ball back in Parliaments court. [O] . E H Kluge 1991

机译：胎儿权利：最高法院将球扔回议会法院。
7. The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada’s Federal Courts: This essay explores what, if anything, it means for the Federal Court of Appeal to be a “court of equity” in the exercise of its jurisdiction over matters related to charitable registration under the Income Tax Act. The equitable jurisdiction over charities encompasses a number of curative principles, which the Court of Chancery traditionally invoked to save indefinite or otherwise defective charitable gifts. The author identifies some of these equitable principles and contemplates how their invocation might have altered the course of certain unsuccessful charitable registration appeals. She then considers the principal arguments for and against the Federal Court of Appeal applying these equitable principles when adjudicating matters related to registered charity status. [O] . 2016

机译：加拿大联邦法院《慈善法》中的平等职能（或失灵）：本文探讨了联邦上诉法院在行使对相关事宜的管辖权时成为“平等法院”的含义（如果有的话）根据《所得税法》进行慈善注册。对慈善组织的公平管辖权包括许多治疗原则，传统上，检举法院援引这些原则以保存无限期或其他有缺陷的慈善礼物。作者指出了其中一些公平原则，并考虑了其调用可能如何改变了某些不成功的慈善注册上诉的过程。然后，她在裁定与注册慈善身分有关的事项时，考虑支持和反对联邦上诉法院的主要论据，运用这些公平原则。

Mineral Servitudes: Imprescriptible Rights; Louisiana Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: United States Court of Federal Claims

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅