...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Data Sharing and Dual-Use Issues
【24h】

Data Sharing and Dual-Use Issues

机译：数据共享和双重使用问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The concept of dual-use encapsulates the potential for well-intentioned, beneficial scientific research to also be misused by a third party for malicious ends. The concept of dual-use challenges scientists to look beyond the immediate outcomes of their research and to develop an awareness of possible future (mis)uses of scientific research. Since 2001 much attention has been paid to the possible need to regulate the dual-use potential of the life sciences. Regulation initiatives fall under two broad categories-those that develop the ethical education of scientists and foster an awareness and responsibility of dual-use issues, and those which assess the regulation of information being generated by current research. Both types of initiatives are premised on a cautious, risk-adverse philosophy which advocates careful examination of all future endpoints of research endeavors. This caution advocated within initiatives such as pre-publication review of journal articles contrasts to the obligation to share underpinning data sharing discussions. As the dual-use debate has yet to make a significant impact on data sharing discussions (and vice versa) it is possible that these two areas of knowledge control may present areas of ethical conflict for scientists, and thus need to be more closely examined. This paper examines the tension between the obligation to share exemplified by data sharing principles and the concerns raised by the risk-cautious culture of the dual-use debates. The paper concludes by reflecting on the issues of responsibility as raised by dual-use as relating to data sharing, such as the chain of custody for shared data.
机译：双重使用的概念封装了良好意图的有益科学研究的潜力，也可能被第三方滥用以达到恶意目的。双重用途的概念向科学家提出了挑战，他们不仅要关注研究的即时成果，而且要意识到人们对科学研究未来可能的滥用。自2001年以来，人们对调节生命科学双重用途潜力的可能需求给予了极大关注。监管举措可分为两大类：一类是对科学家进行道德教育并培养对双重用途问题的认识和责任，另一类是对当前研究所产生的信息的监管进行评估。两种类型的倡议都以谨慎，避免风险的哲学为前提，该哲学主张仔细检查研究工作的所有未来终点。在诸如出版前对期刊文章的评论之类的倡议中提倡的这种谨慎态度与共享基础数据共享讨论的义务形成了鲜明对比。由于双重用途辩论尚未对数据共享讨论产生重大影响（反之亦然），这两个知识控制领域可能会给科学家带来道德冲突领域，因此需要更仔细地研究。本文探讨了以数据共享原则为例的共享义务与双重用途辩论的风险谨慎文化引起的关注之间的张力。本文最后总结了双重用途引起的与数据共享有关的责任问题，例如共享数据的监管链。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号