首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Primary vs Delayed Primary Skin Closure in Contaminated and Dirty Abdominal Incisions.
【24h】

Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Primary vs Delayed Primary Skin Closure in Contaminated and Dirty Abdominal Incisions.

机译:随机临床试验的系统评价和meta分析比较受污染和脏的腹部切口的原发性与延迟性原发性皮肤闭合。

获取原文

摘要

Surgical site infection (SSI) following abdominal surgery is common. When assessed actively and prospectively, it has been found to affect as many as 45% of patients. Furthermore,without active post discharge surveillance, up to 79% of SSI will be missed. Surgical site infection confers significant morbidity,with an additional risk of mortality. There are further health care related costs, through increased hospital stay, repeated surgery, nursing care costs, and drug treatment. Because of these factors, there is international interest in reducing the rate of SSI. To determine using meta-analysis whether delayed primary skin closure (DPC) of contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions reduces the rate of surgical infection compared with primary skin closure (PC). Delayed primary skin closure may reduce the rate of SSI, but current trials fail to provide definitive evidence based on poor design. Well-designed, large-numbered randomized clinical trials are warranted.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号