首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Enlisted Personnel Individualized Career System (EPICS) and Conventional Personnel System (CPS): Preliminary Comparison of Training and Ancillary Costs.
【24h】

Enlisted Personnel Individualized Career System (EPICS) and Conventional Personnel System (CPS): Preliminary Comparison of Training and Ancillary Costs.

机译:入伍人员个人职业生涯系统(EpICs)和常规人事制度(Cps):培训和辅助费用的初步比较。

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this effort was to estimate and compare the formal training and ancillary support costs required to qualify fire control technicians to operate and maintain the NATO Seasparrow Surface Missile System using EPIC (Enlisted Personnel Individualized Career System) and conventional personnel system (CPS) paths. Results showed that, in the case of a new weapon system, requiring the training and support of technicians, EPICS costs would be about 19 percent less than CPS costs for a 200-man cohort and about 25 percent less for a 500-man cohort. In the case of an existing weapon system, where CPS curriculum and materials are available, EPICS costs would be about 7 percent more than CPS costs for a 200-man cohort and about 13 percent less for a 500-man cohort. For initial skills training only, EPICS costs would be about 32 percent less than CPS costs for both cohorts.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号