• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Strengthening Technical Peer Review at the Army S&T Laboratories
【24h】

Strengthening Technical Peer Review at the Army S&T Laboratories

机译：加强陆军科技实验室的技术同行评审

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The assumption underlying the value of peer review is that the quality of work is substantiated or improved through critiques by individuals who are independent, objective, and have specialized knowledge in the subject matter. Outside review often provides a different perspective that can be useful in shaping future work. The use of peer review, using experts in possession of varied and extensive experience, can much improve the quality of work and efficacy of results. The Army Science and Technology Executive, Dr. Thomas Killion, requested a study of peer review methods in use at Army laboratories. This paper discusses Army laboratories in terms of generally accepted best practices and compares them with techniques at other DOD laboratories, and at a few other government agencies. The paper recommends that the Army require peer review of the technical quality of its laboratories and proposes a set of norms that must be met. The principal recommendation is that reviews be performed by independent experts who visit the laboratory for two or more days, looking at the technical projects and the strength of the technical staff, equipment, and facilities. The recommendations include a caveat about potential conflicts of interest in these panels.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号