• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Supply Downsizing: How to Make the Best Fit. A Case Study Between Air Education and Training Command and Air Mobility Command.
【24h】

Supply Downsizing: How to Make the Best Fit. A Case Study Between Air Education and Training Command and Air Mobility Command.

机译：供应缩小规模：如何做到最好。空中教育与训练指挥与空中机动指挥的个案研究。

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The 1997 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) initiatives recommended the military services eliminate 53,000 civilian and 35,000 military positions by fiscal year 2003. As a result of the QDR, Air Mobility Command is eliminating approximately 850 supply manpower authorizations, over 30 percent of their current authorization. At the beginning of this research, AMC leadership was in the midst of adjusting supply personnel and processes to accommodate these significant reductions. Since that time, the command has developed a three-prong strategy to help the Air Force meet the overall QDR manpower reduction requirements Their probable approach is to competitive source (also referred to as outsourcing and privatization) many of the supply functions. The primary reason for outsourcing and privatization is to generate badly needed weapons and infrastructure modernization funds. However, AMC has little experience in outsourcing supply functions within the command Air Education and Training Command (AETC), however, has successfully adopted supply outsourcing at many of their bases. This situation generates the following questions: Can AETC's past and present outsourcing and privatization effort be adapted to meet AMC supply requirements. How can AETC's supply outsourcing effort be utilized by AMC.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号