• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Comparison of Analytical Crack Growth Modelling and the A-4 Wing TestExperimental Results for a Fatigue Crack in an F-111 Wing Pivot Fitting Fuel Flow Hole Number 58
【24h】

Comparison of Analytical Crack Growth Modelling and the A-4 Wing TestExperimental Results for a Fatigue Crack in an F-111 Wing Pivot Fitting Fuel Flow Hole Number 58

机译：分析裂纹扩展模型与a-4翼测试实验结果的比较F-111翼形枢轴中的疲劳裂纹拟合燃料流孔数58

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This report details a series of analyses which were performed to developexpertise and evaluate the performance of several fatigue crack growth prediction computer codes. The analyses were performed for the case of a fatigue crack in the lower plate of the F-111 Wing Pivot Fitting, adjacent to Fuel Flow Hole No 58. This location is a known fatigue critical location and is designated as DI 86. Fatigue cracking leading to failure occurred at this location on the A-4 wing full scale fatigue test after approximately 12,200 hours of testing. An experimentally derived crack growth curve was available from the A-4 wing test. Analytical models were developed using conventional LEFM software codes (FractuREsearch and AFGROW) and the analytical crack closure code, FASTRAN II. The analysis results were compared with the experimental result and also with the analysis originally performed by the manufacturer, General Dynamics. Consistent with previous work, the analytical crack closure code, FASTRAN II, produced the most consistent and accurate results.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号