A Study of Technical Engineering Peer Reviews at NASA

机译：美国国家航空航天局技术工程同行评审研究

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This report describes the state of practices of design reviews at NASA and research into what can be done to improve peer review practices. There are many types of reviews at NASA: required and not, formalized and informal, programmatic and technical. Standing project formal reviews such as the Preliminary Design Review and Critical Design Review are a required part of every project and mission development. However, the technical, engineering peer reviews that support teams' work on such projects are informal, some times ad hoc, and inconsistent across the organization. The goal of this work is to identify best practices and lessons learned from NASA's experience, supported by academic research and methodologies to ultimately improve the process. This research has determined that the organization, composition, scope, and approach of the reviews impact their success. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can identify key areas of concern before or in the reviews. Product definition tools like the Project Priority Matrix, engineering-focused Customer Value Chain Analysis (CVCA), and project or system-based Quality Function Deployment (QFD) help prioritize resources in reviews. The use of information technology and structured design methodologies can strengthen the engineering peer review process to help NASA work towards error-proofing the design process.

著录项

作者
Chao, Lawrence P.; Tumer, Irem Y.; Bell, David G.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2003
页码 1-53
总页数 53
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类工业技术;
关键词
DESIGN ANALYSIS; REVIEWING; NASA PROGRAMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

机译：设计分析;审查;美国宇航局计划;项目管理;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A Combination of Non-Formal and Formal Education Systems for the Students Studying Mechatronics Engineering and Improving Practical Skills and Synergistic Abilities Audrius JAS?NASa* and Eligijus TOLO?KAb Department of Industrial Enterprise Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, J. Basanavi?iaus g. 28, Vilnius, Lithuania a audrius.jasenas@gmail.com,b eligijus.tolocka@vgtu.lt [J] . Audrius JAS?NAS, Eligijus TOLO?KA Diffusion and Defect Data. Solid State Data, Part B. Solid State Phenomena . 2015,第Pta2期

机译：非正规和正规教育系统的结合，用于学习机电工程学并提高实践技能和协同能力的学生Audrius JAS？NASa *和Eligijus TOLO？KAb维尔纽斯格迪米纳斯技术大学工业企业管理系，J。Basanavi？iaus g 。 28日，立陶宛维尔纽斯a audrius.jasenas @ gmail.com，b eligijus.tolocka@vgtu.lt
2. Engineering through distance education in the time of the fourth industrial revolution: Reflections from three decades of peer reviewed studies [J] . Serpil Kocdar, Aras Bozkurt, Tulay Goru Dogan Computer applications in engineering education . 2021,第4期

机译：第四产业革命时远程教育的工程：三十年同行评审研究的思考
3. ARE ROAD SAFETY EVALUATION STUDIES PUBLISHED IN PEER REVIEWED JOURNALS MORE VALID THAN SIMILAR STUDIES NOT PUBLISHED IN PEER REVIEWED JOURNALS? [J] . RUNE ELVK Accident Analysis & Prevention . 1998,第1期

机译：在同行评审期刊中发表的道路安全评估研究是否比在同行评审期刊中未发表的类似研究更有效？
4. Using Model-Based Systems Engineering to Provide Artifacts for NASA Project Life-cycle and Technical Reviews [C] . Edith L. Parrott, Karen J. Weiland AIAA space and astronautics forum and exposition;AIAA space forum . 2017

机译：使用基于模型的系统工程为NASA项目生命周期和技术评审提供工件
5. A Framework for Implementing Systems Engineering Measures at Technical Reviews and Audits. [D] . Orlowski, Christian T. 2017

机译：在技术评审和审核中实施系统工程措施的框架。
6. Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study [O] . Anthony Chauvin, Philippe Ravaud, David Moher, 2019

机译：早期职业同行评审员使用基于CONSORT的在线同行评审工具（COBPeer）与通常的同行评审过程进行的研究报告发现准确性不足：横断面诊断研究
7. The Effect of Tamarisk on Biodiversity and Soil Salinity in Western Colorado Ecosystems - Winner of the 2007 Robert N. Hancock Memorial Scholarship for the best original technical paper written by a student on a topic in the fields of science or engineering (not peer reviewed) [O] . Scott Distel 2007

机译：Tamarisk对西科罗拉多州生态系统的生物多样性和土壤盐度的影响 - 2007年罗伯特N.Hancock纪念奖学金的获胜者，学生在科学或工程领域的一个主题上的最佳原创技术论文（不是同行评审）

A Study of Technical Engineering Peer Reviews at NASA

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅