首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Alternative Funding Method Field Test: An Assessment of the Advantages and Disadvantages Associated with Changing NIDA's Method of Funding Drug Treatment Services
【24h】

Alternative Funding Method Field Test: An Assessment of the Advantages and Disadvantages Associated with Changing NIDA's Method of Funding Drug Treatment Services

机译:替代资助方法现场测试:评估与改变NIDa资助药物治疗服务方法相关的利弊

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of changing the slot method of funding to fund drug abuse treatment. Thirty-four drug treatment programs in five states participated in the test of an Alternative Funding Method (AFM) for National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) between April 1980 and June 1981. The test design included specific activities in each of the four major components of the cycle: (a) develop service plans and budgets; (b) report services delivered against plan; (c) manage performance against plan; and (d) make funding decisions based upon specific performance criteria. The field test results indicated that the AFM method can improve state management capability and should replace the slot funding mechanism. The study recommended that individual states should evaluate the method as a management tool as they define their new role under the block grant.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号