• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Foregrounding socio-economic rights in transitional justice:realising justice for violations of economic and social rights
【2h】

Foregrounding socio-economic rights in transitional justice:realising justice for violations of economic and social rights

机译：过渡时期司法中的社会经济权利的前瞻：对侵犯经济和社会权利的行为实现正义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Transitional justice has traditionally ignored or sidelined violations of economic and social rights, focussing on violations of civil and political rights as the primary grave human rights violations to be addressed when seeking justice for past atrocities. This paper explores the omission of these rights from the field and uncovers the shortcomings of such an approach. It will argue that there is a need for transitional justice to address both deliberate violations of economic and social rights resulting from conflict or repression, but also structural violations which have acted as root causes of conflict within the State. It is submitted that past experiences of prosecutorial and restorative justice illustrate that violations of economic and social rights have been acknowledged as background information rather than primary concerns for transitional justice. In conclusion it is contended that economic and social rights need to be brought to the foreground of transitional justice processes in order to ensure effective transitional justice which reflects the needs and rights of the local population, and addresses the root causes of conflict, thus preventing conflict reoccurring around the same sources. The inclusion of economic and social rights concerns within transitional justice mechanisms will therefore contribute to a more holistic and inclusive transitional justice process.
机译：过渡时期司法传统上无视或忽视对经济和社会权利的侵犯，侧重于侵犯公民权利和政治权利，这是在为过去的暴行寻求正义时要解决的主要严重侵犯人权行为。本文从实地探讨了这些权利的遗漏，并揭示了这种方法的缺点。它将辩称，有必要建立过渡司法，以解决冲突或压迫造成的蓄意侵犯经济和社会权利的行为，也要解决构成国家内部冲突根源的结构性侵犯行为。据指出，过去在检察和恢复性司法方面的经验表明，承认侵犯经济和社会权利是背景信息，而不是过渡时期司法的主要关切。总之，有人认为，必须将经济和社会权利置于过渡时期司法程序的前列，以确保有效的过渡时期司法能够反映当地居民的需求和权利，并解决冲突的根源，从而预防冲突围绕相同的来源重复发生。因此，将经济和社会权利问题纳入过渡时期司法机制将有助于更加全面和包容的过渡时期司法程序。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cahill-Ripley Amanda;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号