• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Choice and Inevitability in Modelling an Organization's Future (How Management, depending on the Company's Organizational Context, can shape an Organization's Future with the use of Choice and/or the Reliance on Determinism)
【2h】

Choice and Inevitability in Modelling an Organization's Future (How Management, depending on the Company's Organizational Context, can shape an Organization's Future with the use of Choice and/or the Reliance on Determinism)

机译：在组织的未来建模中的选择和必然性（管理层如何根据公司的组织环境，通过使用选择和/或对确定性的依赖来塑造组织的未来）

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The literature presents us with two distinct, and at times opposed, approaches to strategic management: the use of strategic choice and determinism.This research shows that these approaches can actually be considered as two distinct variables, which create a space or framework in which it is possible to identify, according to the available different amounts of strategic choice and determinism, the four different ontological perspectives of determinism, hard incompatibilism, libertarianism and compatibilism.According to the literature, within each ontological perspective of the strategic choice/determinism framework, companies use different levels of strategic choice and determinism to produce organizational outcomes.This research provides empirical evidence of the real life existence of these ontological perspectives, in which companies’ performance of revenues is driven by a different amount of strategic choice or determinism according to the perspectives in which companies operate. This research also shows that other important performance indicators, such as EBITDA, depend only on deterministic variables, while ROA depends neither on strategic choice nor on deterministic variables.These findings suggest that future research could increase our knowledge on the internal environment of companies, as it could do from the hard incompatibilist perspective, which was not possible to study thoroughly within this research.The research conclusions provide several contributions to both academic knowledge and practice.
机译：文献为我们提供了两种不同的，有时是相反的战略管理方法：使用战略选择和决定论。这项研究表明，这些方法实际上可以被视为两个不同的变量，从而在其中创造了空间或框架。可以根据可用的不同数量的战略选择和决定论来确定决定论，硬不相容，自由主义和相容论的四种不同的本体论观点。根据文献，在战略选择/决定论框架的每个本体论观点下，公司本研究提供了这些本体论观点在现实生活中存在的实证证据，其中公司的收入绩效受不同数量的战略选择或决定论驱动公司在其中经营。这项研究还表明，其他重要的绩效指标（例如EBITDA）仅取决于确定性变量，而ROA既不取决于战略选择也不取决于确定性变量。这些发现表明，未来的研究可能会增加我们对公司内部环境的了解，因为从严格的不兼容论者的角度来看，这是可以做到的，这是不可能在本研究中进行彻底研究的。研究结论为学术知识和实践提供了一些贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tumidei Daniele;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号