• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements: Some Issues on the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and its Relationship with the Brussels I Recast Especially Anti-Suit Injunctions, Concurrent Proceedings and the Implications of Brexit
【2h】

Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements: Some Issues on the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and its Relationship with the Brussels I Recast Especially Anti-Suit Injunctions, Concurrent Proceedings and the Implications of Brexit

机译：独家法院协议选择：关于法院协定的“海牙公约”及其与布鲁塞尔的关系的若干问题，我重视特别是反诉讼，并发诉讼和BREXIT的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article contends that the Hague Choice of Court Agreement Convention’s (‘Hague Convention’) system of ‘qualified’ or ‘partial’ mutual trust may permit anti-suit injunctions, actions for damages for breach of exclusive jurisdiction agreements and anti-enforcement injunctions where such remedies further the objective of the Convention. However, intra-EU Hague Convention cases may arguably not permit remedies for breach of exclusive jurisdiction agreements as they may infringe the principle of mutual trust and the principle of effectiveness of EU law (effet utile) which animate the multilateral jurisdiction and judgments order of the Brussels I Recast Regulation. The relationship between Article 31(2) of the Brussels I Recast and Articles 5 and 6 of the Hague Convention is also mapped in this article. It will be argued that the Hartley-Dogauchi Report’s interpretative approach has much to commend it as it follows the path of least resistance by narrowly construing the right to sue in a non-chosen forum as an exception rather than the norm. This exceptional nature of the right to sue in the non-chosen forum under the Hague Convention can be effectively reconciled with the Recast Regulation's reverse lis pendens rule under Article 31(2). This will usually result in the stay of the proceedings in the non-chosen court as soon as the chosen court is seised. The impact of BREXIT on this area of the law is uncertain but it has been argued that the likely outcome post-BREXIT is that the regime applicable between the UK and the EU (apart from Denmark) in relation to exclusive jurisdiction agreements within the scope of the Hague Convention will be the Hague Convention.
机译：本文认为，“合格”或“部分”互信的海牙法院选择协议公约（“海牙公约”）体系可能允许反诉讼禁令，违反专属管辖权协议的损害赔偿诉讼以及在以下情况下的反强制执行令：这种补救措施进一步促进了《公约》的目标。但是，《欧盟海牙公约》案件可能会因违反专属管辖权协议而可能不允许采取补救措施，因为它们可能会侵犯相互信任的原则和使多边管辖权和判决顺序具有活力的欧盟法律效力原则（效用）。布鲁塞尔一世重铸法规。本条款还规定了《布鲁塞尔第一修正案》第31条第2款与《海牙公约》第5条和第6条之间的关系。有人认为，《哈特利-道高奇报告》的解释方法值得赞扬，因为它沿狭小的阻力路线通过狭义地解释在非选择的论坛中提起诉讼的权利为例外而不是规范。 《海牙公约》规定的在非选定论坛中提起诉讼的权利的这种特殊性质，可以与《重铸法规》第31条第2款规定的反倾销规则有效地加以调和。通常，一旦选定的法院被查封，通常将导致诉讼在非选定法院中止。英国脱欧对这一法律领域的影响尚不确定，但有人认为，英国脱欧后可能产生的结果是，英国和欧盟（丹麦除外）之间适用于在以下范围内的专属管辖权协议的制度《海牙公约》将成为《海牙公约》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号