首页> 外文OA文献 >Entry and exit as a source of aggregate productivity growth in two alternative technological regimes
【2h】

Entry and exit as a source of aggregate productivity growth in two alternative technological regimes

机译:作为两种替代技术制度的总生产力增长的进入和退出

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper proposes a neo-Schumpeterian model in order to discuss how the mechanisms of entry and exit contribute to industry productivity growth in alternative technological regimes. By assuming a) that firms learn about the technology through a variety of sources, and b) a continuous flow of entry and exit, our numerical simulation exercise does show that exits and contraction take mostly place among less productive firms, while entry and expansion are concentrated among the more efficient ones. We were also able to replicate the fact that the entry-exit effect is larger in the entrepreneurial regime, while the contribution of continuing firms is larger in the routinized regime. Our model was thus very effective in replicating some major empirical regularities of industry dynamics, including the very prominent role of entry and exit in productivity growth. Our analysis also suggests that micro analysis is the proper complement to aggregate industry studies, as it provides a considerable insight into the causes of productivity growth.
机译:本文提出了一个新的熊彼特模型,以讨论进入和退出机制如何在替代技术体制中促进行业生产率的增长。通过假设a)企业通过各种渠道了解技术,以及b)持续的进入和退出流程,我们的数值模拟实验确实表明,退出和收缩主要发生在生产力较低的公司中,而进入和扩张是集中在更有效的。我们还能够复制这样一个事实,即企业家制度中的进入-退出效应更大,而常规化制度中的连续性公司的贡献更大。因此,我们的模型在复制行业动态的一些主要经验规律方面非常有效,包括进入和退出对生产率增长的显著作用。我们的分析还表明,微观分析是对总体行业研究的适当补充,因为它对生产率增长的原因提供了相当多的见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号