• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Hard Work in Soft Regulation: A Discussion of the Social Mechanisms in OHS Management Standards and Possible Dilemmas in the Regulation of Psychosocial Work Environment
【2h】

Hard Work in Soft Regulation: A Discussion of the Social Mechanisms in OHS Management Standards and Possible Dilemmas in the Regulation of Psychosocial Work Environment

机译：软化努力：讨论鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂鄂族管理标准及可能的困境，在心理社会工作环境中的困境中的讨论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Certified occupational health and safety (OHS) management systems have become a global instrument in regulation of the work environment. However, their actual impact on OHS—in particular on softer psychosocial issues in the work environment—has been questioned. The most important standard of OHS management is OHSAS 18001, which has recently been supplemented with a British publically available guideline (PAS 1010) focusing specifically on psychosocial risk management. On the basis of the international literature on management standards, the present paper analyses OHSAS 18001 and PAS 1010 in order to understand the mechanism by which they work. The paper takes a social constructionist approach conceptualizing standards and their expected mechanisms as socially constructed—based on a particular kind of knowledge and logic—although they are presented as objective. Such a constructionist approach also emphasizes how standards transform specific work environment problems into generic procedures that can be audited. In the case of OHS standards, both the work environment in general and the psychosocial risks in particular are transformed into simple monocausal auditable relations whereby the complexity of psychosocial work environment issues seems to disappear. The new PAS 1010 guideline, which is particularly focusing on regulation of the psychosocial work environment, only partly succeeds in solving these shortcomings of OHSAS 18001.
机译：认证的职业健康和安全（OHS）管理系统已经成为工作环境调节的全球文书。然而，他们的实际影响OHS，特别是在工作中更柔和心理问题的环境，一直受到质疑。职业健康安全管理的最重要的标准是OHSAS 18001，最近补充了英国公开可用的指导方针（PAS 1010）特别侧重于心理社会风险管理。在对管理标准的国际文献的基础上，本论文以了解通过他们的工作机制，分析了OHSAS 18001和PAS 1010。本文以社会建构的方式为社会构建的基础上有一种特殊的知识和逻辑，尽管它们都客观概念化标准及其预期的机制。这样的建构方法还强调标准是如何转变的具体工作环境中的问题转换成可以被审计的一般程序。在OHS标准的情况下，无论是工作环境一般，特别是心理风险转化为简单的单因审计关系从而使社会心理工作环境问题的复杂性似乎消失了。新的PAS 1010准则，这是特别注重心理工作环境的调节，只有部分成功地解决OHSAS 18001的这些缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号