首页> 外文OA文献 >How to “Get” Grounded and Not “Get” Lost: Review of Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide
【2h】

How to “Get” Grounded and Not “Get” Lost: Review of Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide

机译:如何“扎根”而不是“扎根”:质性研究扎根理论综述:实用指南

摘要

As a developing PhD student one must work to develop the ability to apply critical thinking skills and analysis. In my pursuit to further understand qualitative research methods, I chose to look more closely at grounded theory method due to its seemingly complex structure and unique method of theory development. Urquhart (2013) works to present the components of grounded theory method (GTM) as a reaction to confusion and frustration of postgraduate students struggling with the method. She provides a sequential “how to” guide on GTM while asserting the importance of staying flexible within the structure. She acknowledges and addresses the criticism of GTM and strives to dispel myths associated with the method.
机译:作为一名正在发展的博士生,必须努力发展运用批判性思维技能和分析的能力。在寻求进一步了解定性研究方法的过程中,我选择更深入地研究扎根的理论方法,因为它看似复杂的结构和独特的理论发展方法。 Urquhart(2013)致力于提出扎根理论方法(GTM)的组成部分,以应对那些努力学习该方法的研究生的困惑和沮丧。她提供了有关GTM的循序渐进的“操作方法”指南,同时强调了保持结构内部灵活性的重要性。她承认并解决了GTM的批评,并努力消除与该方法有关的神话。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wyatt Kristin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号