• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis
【2h】

Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis

机译：Cochrane定性和实施方法组指导系列 - 纸张2：质疑制定，搜索和协议开发的方法，用于定性证据综合

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper updates previous Cochrane guidance on question formulation,searching and protocol development, reflecting recent developments in methods for conducting qualitative evidence syntheses to inform Cochrane intervention reviews. Examples are used to illustrate how decisions about boundaries for a review are formed via an iterative process of constructing lines of inquiry, and mapping the information available to ascertain whether evidence exists to answer questions related to effectiveness, implementation, feasibility, appropriateness, economic evidence, and equity. The process of question formulation allows reviewers to situate the topic in relation to how it informs and explains effectiveness, using the criterion of meaningfulness, appropriateness, feasibility and implementation. Questions related to complex questions and interventions can be structured by drawing on an increasingly wide range of question frameworks. Logic models and theoretical frameworks are useful tools for conceptually mapping the literature to illustrate the complexity of the phenomenon of interest. Further, protocol development may require iterative question formulation and searching. Consequently, the final protocol may function as a guide rather than a prescriptive route-map, particularly in qualitative reviews that ask more exploratory and open ended questions.
机译：本文更新了先前的Cochrane指导关于问题制定，搜索和协议开发，反映了进行定性证据合成的方法的最新发展，以告知Cochrane干预审查。示例用于说明通过构建查询线的迭代过程，以及映射可用于确定有效，实施，可行性，适当性，经济证据的问题的信息来形成关于审查的界限的决策。和股权。问题制定的过程允许审阅者在利用有意义，适当性，可行性和实施的标准，介绍其如何通知和解释有效性。与复杂问题和干预相关的问题可以通过绘制越来越多的问题框架来构建。逻辑模型和理论框架是概念上映射文献的有用工具，以说明感兴趣的现象的复杂性。此外，协议开发可能需要迭代问题和搜索。因此，最终协议可以用作指导而不是规范的路线图，特别是在质量审查中，以提出更多探索性和开放的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号