• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with Circumferential Mucosal Incision for Colorectal Neoplasms: Comparison with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and between Two Endoscopists with Different Experiences
【2h】

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with Circumferential Mucosal Incision for Colorectal Neoplasms: Comparison with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and between Two Endoscopists with Different Experiences

机译：内镜粘膜切除与结肠直肠肿瘤的周向粘膜切口：与内窥镜粘膜粘膜解剖和两位内窥镜员进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background/Aims Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision (CMI-EMR) may offer benefits comparable to those of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), while requiring less technical proficiency than ESD. Methods We retrospectively compared the outcomes of CMI-EMR (n=34) and size-matched ESD (n=102), which were performed by a Korean endoscopist for colorectal epithelial lesions of 20–35 mm. Procedural parameters of CMI-EMRs performed by an American ESD novice (n=30) were compared with those performed by the Korean endoscopist. Results The lesion size was 22.3±3.9 mm and 22.9±2.4 mm in the CMI-EMR and size-matched ESD groups, respectively (p=0.730). The resection time was 12.7±7.0 minutes in the CMI-EMR group and 45.6±30.1 minutes in the ESD group (p<0.001). The en bloc resection rate was 94.1% in the CMI-EMR group and 100% in the ESD group (p=0.061). There were no differences in the en bloc resection and complication rates of CMI-EMRs between a Korean and an American endoscopist. Conclusions For the treatment of moderate-size colorectal lesions, CMI-EMR showed a trend toward lower en bloc resection rate, but required shorter procedure time than ESD. CMI-EMR outcomes were similar when performed by a Korean ESD expert and an American ESD novice.
机译：背景/旨在具有周向粘膜切口（CMI-EMR）的内窥镜粘膜切除，可以提供与内窥镜粘膜粘膜粘膜释放（ESD）相当的益处，同时需要较少的技术熟练程度而非ESD。方法回顾性地比较了CMI-EMR（n = 34）和尺寸匹配的ESD（n = 102）的结果，其由韩国内窥镜病变为20-35mm的结直肠上皮病变进行。将美国ESD新手（N = 30）执行的CMI-EMRS的程序参数与韩国内窥镜师执行的人进行比较。结果分别在CMI-EMR和尺寸匹配的ESD组中分别为22.3±3.9mm和22.9±2.4mm（p = 0.730）。在CMI-EMR组中切除时间为12.7±7.0分钟，在ESD组中为45.6±30.1分钟（P <0.001）。 CMI-EMR组的EN集团切除率为94.1％，在ESD组中100％（P = 0.061）。韩国和美国内窥镜师之间的CMI-EMRS的en Bloc切除和并发症率没有差异。结论用于治疗中等大小结肠直肠病变，CMI-EMR显示出较低的EN集团切除率的趋势，但需要比ESD更短的程序时间。韩国ESD专家和美国ESD新手执行时，CMI-EMR结果类似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号