首页> 外文OA文献 >Strategy and Performance Measurement How do managers react if there is tension between strategy and performance measurement Ron Konjer 836964561 Open University Netherlands Faculty : Management Sciences Education : Master of Science in Management Mentor/Examiner : Drs. Veneklaas Slots Co-Examiner : Dr. Kamminga February,
【2h】

Strategy and Performance Measurement How do managers react if there is tension between strategy and performance measurement Ron Konjer 836964561 Open University Netherlands Faculty : Management Sciences Education : Master of Science in Management Mentor/Examiner : Drs. Veneklaas Slots Co-Examiner : Dr. Kamminga February,

机译:战略和绩效评估如果战略和绩效评估之间存在紧张关系,管理者会如何反应Ron Konjer 836964561荷兰公开大学教师:管理科学教育:管理学理学硕士导师/考官:博士。 Veneklaas Slots共同审查员:Kamminga博士,

摘要

Key WordsStrategy, Performance Measurement, Balanced Score Card, tensions, leading and lagging indicators,distracting or ignoring or pseudo alignment tacticsAbstractAlmost every organization has some kind of a Strategy and uses some kind of PerformanceMeasurement. Although having a Strategy and a Performance Measurement System (PMS)is no reason to survive and reach the optimal performance. In a cover article of the Fortune(June 1999) of failures of organizations the conclusion was that focus on strategy and visionapparently led to the misplaced believe that the only thing management needed was havinga good strategy. In approximately 70% of all cases the real problem is not the strategy itselfbut implementing the strategy. To know if a Strategy is implemented it has to be measured.By measuring this there might be tension as the outcomes might indicate that the Strategy isnot implemented as desired and hence the results of the organization will also not be thedesired outcomes. In this research the main question consists of the way Managers act incase there is tension between the Strategy and the Performance Measurement.As the implementation of Strategy is seen as highly critical it is also necessary to know if it isimplemented and to know what will be one if this is not the case. The financial industryseems to be an interesting sector to make further research on this theme as their outputconsists of services and hence intangible assets which are closely tight with their Strategy. Inorder to do so a research is done at a medium sized organization within this financialindustry. The main question in this thesis is:How do managers react if there is tension between strategy and performance measurement(PM)?Tensions do exist but not because the Performance Measurement system shows that theStrategy is not met or implemented. The current Performance Measurement System andmore in particular the BSC does not guarantee whether the organization is able to assess ifthe organization meets its Strategic goals. Targets are defined on a yearly bases followingbudget and based on a three year perspective. As market circumstances change the targetschange also during this Strategic period. As the implementation of Strategy is not visiblymeasured by the BSC it is difficult to assess whether Managers use the mitigating tactics ofdoing nothing, pseudo alignment or distracting focus from the discussion. As Strategy is nottranslated into actions and there is no specific measurement through a PMS then there istension. Strategy should be implemented and the performance indicators and the PMSshould be aligned to Strategy. The missing part is how to do so and that is where the tensionis about.Managers at this organization prefer to adapt the Performance Measurement system andbased on the outcomes decide what has to be changed on Strategic level. During theinterviews none of the mitigating strategies have been proven and consequently we canconclude that the described mitigating strategies (doing nothing, pseudo alignment ordistracting focus) are not applicable for the Managers and management style of thisorganization.Master Thesis Drs. RG Konjer Page 3 of 3So by using the BSC in the (ongoing) Strategic process the Strategy can be better analyzedwith the feedback of the organization and make the Strategy more tangible. So perhaps theconclusion should be that if an organization wishes to implement its Strategy it should usethe BSC to get a clear view on the Strategy and by doing so the Strategy might getimplemented
机译:关键词战略,绩效衡量,平衡计分卡,紧张局势,领先指标和落后指标,分散注意力或无视或伪对齐策略摘要几乎每个组织都有某种战略并使用某种绩效衡量。尽管拥有策略和绩效评估系统(PMS)并不是生存和达到最佳绩效的理由。在《财富》杂志组织失败的一篇封面文章(1999年6月)中,得出的结论是,专注于战略和远见显然导致人们误以为是,管理所需要的只是拥有一个好的战略。在大约所有情况的70%中,真正的问题不是战略本身,而是实施战略。要知道是否要实施一项战略,就必须对其进行衡量。由于进行衡量,结果可能表明该战略未如预期那样实施,因此组织的结果也将不是理想的结果。在这项研究中,主要问题在于如果战略与绩效评估之间存在紧张关系,管理者的行为方式。由于战略的实施被认为是至关重要的,因此也有必要知道战略是否得以实施以及要知道什么是战略的实施。如果不是这种情况。金融业似乎是一个有趣的行业,可以对此主题进行进一步的研究,因为它们的输出包括服务以及与战略紧密相关的无形资产。为了做到这一点,需要在该金融行业内的一个中等规模的组织中进行研究。本论文的主要问题是:如果战略与绩效衡量之间存在张力,管理者会如何反应?确实存在张力,但不是因为绩效衡量体系表明战略未得到满足或实施。当前的绩效评估系统,尤其是BSC不能保证组织是否能够评估组织是否满足其战略目标。目标是在预算之后的年度基础上,并基于三年的角度来定义的。随着市场环境的变化,目标也将在此战略时期内发生变化。由于平衡计分卡无法对战略的实施情况进行衡量,因此很难评估管理者是否使用了无所作为,虚假结盟或分散讨论重点的缓解策略。由于策略没有转化为行动,并且没有通过PMS进行具体衡量,因此存在压力。应实施策略,绩效指标和PMS应与策略保持一致。缺少的部分是如何做到这一点,这就是紧张的根源。该组织的经理们更喜欢采用绩效评估系统,并根据结果来决定必须在战略层面上进行哪些更改。在访谈期间,没有缓解策略得到证实,因此我们可以得出结论,所描述的缓解策略(不进行任何操作,伪对准或分散注意力)不适用于该组织的管理者和管理风格。 RG Konjer第3页,共3页因此,通过在(进行中的)战略过程中使用BSC,可以在组织的反馈下更好地分析该战略,并使该战略更加切实。因此,也许结论应该是,如果组织希望实施其战略,则应使用BSC对该战略有一个清晰的认识,并通过这样做可以实施该战略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Konjer;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 nl
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号