• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Norden - en europæisk forskningsregion? (NordForsks mulighed for at udvikle Norden til en europæisk forskningsregion set på baggrund af den forskningspolitiske udvikling i EU og Norden 1970-2008)
【2h】

Norden - en europæisk forskningsregion? (NordForsks mulighed for at udvikle Norden til en europæisk forskningsregion set på baggrund af den forskningspolitiske udvikling i EU og Norden 1970-2008)

机译：北欧地区-欧洲研究区？ （根据1970-2008年欧盟和北欧国家的研究政策发展，NordForsk有机会将北欧地区发展为欧洲研究区）

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is a generally accepted idea that the basis for the future of the economies, of not just the Nordic countries but of EU as a whole, is a transition to a (more) knowledge based economy. An important tool to achieve this goal is research policy.The background to this thesis is the feasibility and chances for success of a common Nordic research policy, since the Nordic countries by themselves all have relatively small populations. Taken together, though, the population of the Nordic countries is enough to achieve what is often termed “critical mass” in research programs, and thus makes the Nordic region a significant player in or contributor to international research schemes. Especially in relation to EU, the Nordic countries are in a good position to make a common effort, since all are either members (Denmark, Finland, Sweden) or part of the EEA agreement through EFTA (Iceland, Norway). At the same time the regional cooperation between the Nordic countries has a long history and long established organizations through both the Nordic Council and the Nordic Council of Ministers.In this thesis we analyze Nordic and EU research policy in the period 1970-2008 and what characterizes each of these. In addition to this historical analysis, we make a case study of the Nordic research institution NordForsk. We then use the results from this historical analysis in conjunction with the case study to see if, how and under which conditions NordForsk can be used to develop the Nordic region as a European research region. Thus the thesis covers both History and Public Administration.We have found that EU research policy has generally been characterized more by industrial or innovation policy than by the kind of broad research policy, including basic research, which is typically found in the member states, and their commitment has been half hearted at best.Nordic research policy has been characterized by an overshadowing emphasis on consensus and grass roots ad hoc solutions, and lacked member states’ commitment and an overarching goal.We see a clear possibility in NordForsk as the only true Nordic research policy institution, but it is necessary to expand its mandate and especially the commitment of the Nordic states to a common agenda to achieve the kind of synergies, that make such a Nordic institution relevant. In the absence of such initiatives an institution such as NordForsk is of relatively small significance, although it may yield good results by supporting a few small projects.
机译：人们普遍认为，不仅是北欧国家，而且整个欧盟经济的未来基础都是向（更多）知识经济的过渡。实现这一目标的重要工具是研究政策。本文的背景是一项共同的北欧研究政策的可行性和成功的机会，因为北欧国家本身的人口都相对较少。综上所述，北欧国家的人口足以实现研究计划中通常所说的“临界数量”，因此使北欧地区成为国际研究计划的重要参与者或做出了贡献。特别是在欧盟方面，北欧国家处于共同努力的良好位置，因为它们都是欧盟成员国（丹麦，芬兰，瑞典）或通过欧洲自由贸易区（EETA）通过的欧洲经济区协议的一部分（冰岛，挪威）。同时，北欧国家之间的区域合作历史悠久，并且通过北欧理事会和北欧部长理事会建立了长期的组织。在这篇论文中，我们分析了北欧和欧盟在1970-2008年期间的研究政策以及这些政策的特点。除了这种历史分析之外，我们还对北欧研究机构NordForsk进行了案例研究。然后，我们结合历史分析结果和案例研究，来研究是否可以，如何以及在何种条件下使用NordForsk将北欧地区发展为欧洲研究区。因此，本文涵盖了历史学和公共管理学。我们发现，欧盟研究政策的特征通常更多地在于工业或创新政策，而不是广泛的研究政策，包括基础研究（通常在成员国中发现）。他们的承诺充其量是半心半意的。北欧研究政策的特点是过分强调共识和基层临时解决方案，缺乏成员国的承诺和总体目标。北欧研究政策机构，但有必要将其任务授权，尤其是北欧国家对共同议程的承诺扩大，以实现使这种北欧机构具有意义的协同作用。在没有此类倡议的情况下，诸如NordForsk之类的机构的重要性相对较小，尽管它可以通过支持一些小型项目而产生良好的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号