• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Carrot or stick? – Would information concerning the economic value of nutrient losses, and their impact on food quality achieve greater environmental protection than regulation?ud
【2h】

Carrot or stick? – Would information concerning the economic value of nutrient losses, and their impact on food quality achieve greater environmental protection than regulation?ud

机译：胡萝卜还是棍子？ –有关营养损失的经济价值及其对食品质量的影响的信息是否比法规更能实现环境保护？ ud

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This report was presented at the UK Organic Research 2002 Conference. Organic standards have, since their origin (Soil Association 1967) required high standards of manure management, but in reality, these have not been implemented, possibly because of perceived costs of improved handling. However, a cost/benefit analysis of intermediate steps of nutrient conservation and manure handling may provide a practical solution, optimising retention of nutrients, financial and time inputs and environmental protection. Recent research on composting with conventional manures has quantified nutrient losses from heaps with different treatments (Parkinson et al, 2001). Financial and environmental costs and benefits of different management approaches are discussed.
机译：该报告在2002年英国有机研究大会上发表。自有机标准产生以来（Soil Association 1967），就要求高标准的粪便管理，但实际上，这些标准尚未得到实施，这可能是因为人们意识到改善处理的成本。但是，对养分养护和粪便处理的中间步骤进行成本/收益分析可能会提供一种实用的解决方案，可以优化养分的保留，财务和时间投入以及环境保护。最近对常规肥料进行堆肥的研究已经量化了采用不同处理方法的堆肥的营养损失（Parkinson等，2001）。讨论了不同管理方法的财务和环境成本及收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号