首页> 外文OA文献 >The Paradox of the Baltic States: Labour Market Flexibility but Protected Workers?
【2h】

The Paradox of the Baltic States: Labour Market Flexibility but Protected Workers?

机译:波罗的海国家的悖论:劳动力市场的灵活性但受保护的工人呢?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article assesses the strictness of employment protection legislation and its actual enforcement in the Baltic States. We use information from the applicable legislation as well as employer surveys, data on the coverage of labour legislation and the practice of law enforcement. Overall strictness is close to the average of EU countries and relatively well aligned with EU regulations; individual and collective dismissals are relatively heavily and temporary forms of employment relatively weakly regulated. However, effective flexibility is increased by problems of enforcement: there is much evidence of violations of statutory regulations at enterprise level. In addition, the proportion of the workforce actually covered by the regulations is relatively low. In the Baltic States temporary employment is more widespread, implying a higher level of flexibility than the EU average.
机译:本文评估了波罗的海国家就业保护立法的严格性及其实际执行情况。我们使用适用法律,雇主调查中的信息,有关劳工法律的覆盖范围以及执法实践的数据。总体严格度接近欧盟国家的平均水平,并且与欧盟法规相对一致;个人和集体解雇相对较多,而临时就业形式的监管相对较弱。但是,执行方面的问题增加了有效的灵活性:有许多证据表明,企业级法规受到违反。此外,法规实际涵盖的劳动力比例相对较低。在波罗的海国家,临时就业更为普遍,这意味着其灵活性要高于欧盟的平均水平。

著录项

  • 作者

    Eamets Raul; Masso Jaan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号