• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessing the claims of participatory measurement, reporting and verification (PMRV) in achieving REDD+ outcomes: A systematic review
【2h】

Assessing the claims of participatory measurement, reporting and verification (PMRV) in achieving REDD+ outcomes: A systematic review

机译：评估参与式测量，报告和验证（PMRV）在实现REDD +结果方面的主张：系统回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Participation of local communities in the Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) of forest changes has been promoted as a strategy that lowers the cost of MRV and increases their engagement with REDD+. This systematic review of literature assessed the claims of participatory MRV (PMRV) in achieving REDD+ outcomes. We identified 29 PMRV publications that consisted of 20 peer-reviewed and 9 non peer-reviewed publications, with 14 publications being empirically based studies. The evidence supporting PMRV claims was categorized into empirical finding, citation or assumption. Our analysis of the empirical studies showed that PMRV projects were conducted in 17 countries in three tropical continents and across various forest and land tenure types. Most of these projects tested the feasibility of participatory measurement or monitoring, which limited the participation of local communities to data gathering. PMRV claims of providing accurate local biomass measurements and lowering MRV cost were well-supported with empirical evidence. Claims that PMRV supports REDD+ social outcomes that affect local communities directly, such as increased environmental awareness and equity in benefit sharing, were supported with less empirical evidence than REDD+ technical outcomes. This may be due to the difficulties in measuring social outcomes and the slow progress in the development and implementation of REDD+ components outside of experimental research contexts. Although lessons from other monitoring contexts have been used to support PMRV claims, they are only applicable when the enabling conditions can be replicated in REDD+ contexts. There is a need for more empirical evidence to support PMRV claims on achieving REDD+ social outcomes, which may be addressed with more opportunities and rigorous methods for assessing REDD+ social outcomes. Integrating future PMRV studies into local REDD+ implementations may help create those opportunities, while increasing the participation of local communities as local REDD+ stakeholders. Further development and testing of participatory reporting framework are required to integrate PMRV data with the national database. Publication of empirical PMRV studies is encouraged to guide when, where and how PMRV should be implemented. (Résumé d'auteur)
机译：促进了当地社区参与森林变化的测量，报告和验证（MRV），以此作为降低MRV成本并增加其对REDD +参与的战略。这篇系统的文献综述评估了参与式MRV（PMRV）在实现REDD +结果方面的主张。我们确定了29篇PMRV出版物，其中包括20篇同行评审的出版物和9篇未经同行评审的出版物，其中14篇出版物是基于经验的研究。支持PMRV主张的证据分为经验发现，引用或假设。我们对实证研究的分析表明，PMRV项目在三个热带大洲的17个国家和不同的森林和土地保有权类型中进行。这些项目大多数都测试了参与式测量或监测的可行性，这限制了当地社区对数据收集的参与。 PMRV关于提供准确的本地生物量测量和降低MRV成本的主张得到了经验证据的充分支持。声称PMRV支持直接影响当地社区的REDD +社会成果，例如增强的环境意识和利益共享中的公平性，而获得的经验证据少于REDD +技术成果。这可能是由于无法衡量社会成果以及在实验研究环境之外开发和实施REDD +组件的进展缓慢。尽管已使用其他监视上下文中的课程来支持PMRV声明，但它们仅适用于可以在REDD +上下文中复制启用条件的情况。需要更多的经验证据来支持PMRV关于实现REDD +社会成果的主张，这可以通过更多的机会和严格的方法来评估REDD +社会成果来解决。将未来的PMRV研究整合到本地REDD +实施中可能有助于创造这些机会，同时增加当地社区作为本地REDD +利益相关者的参与。需要进一步开发和测试参与性报告框架，以将PMRV数据与国家数据库整合。鼓励发表经验性PMRV研究以指导何时，何地以及如何实施PMRV。 （Résuméd'auteur）

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号