首页> 外文OA文献 >Pluralism and Deformalisation as Mechanisms in the Achievement of MoreudEquitable and Just Outcomes – the Move from „Classical Formalism“ toudDeformalisation.
【2h】

Pluralism and Deformalisation as Mechanisms in the Achievement of MoreudEquitable and Just Outcomes – the Move from „Classical Formalism“ toudDeformalisation.

机译:多元化和形式化是实现“更多”的机制公平公正的结果–从“古典形式主义”到 ud变形处理。

摘要

By tracing the development and evolvement of certain legal theories over the centuries, as well asudconsequences emanating from such developments, this paper highlights how and why a shift fromudthe model of „classical formalism“ towards more deformalised models has arisen.udThe paper also illustrates how deformalisation and „a corresponding loss of certainty“ could beudharnessed in order to provide for greater „realism“ and externalities, whilst still attaining audrespectable level of consistency. Developments and efforts aimed at exploring the applicability ofudclassical formalism and deformalised models should be regarded as „an endeavour to establish audconsistency of terms, as well as a probing into how far principles, notions, and rules for decisionudmaking can be generalised, and rectification when generalisations have gone too far.“udUnity, as well as „a common law of mankind“ are goals which are still capable of being achievedudeven where fragmentation, diversification and pluralisation of the law occur. Such processes ofudspecialisation, where correspondingly countered by the appropriate level of generality as well as theudability to apply rules – such that they are consistently applied in similar situations, are capable ofudachieving more equitable, just and unifying goals as opposed to a model which merely strives forudthe achievement of legal certainty. Looking beyond the borders of legal theory may indeed provideudthe much needed redress in situations where generalisations exceed the required limits.
机译:通过追踪几个世纪以来某些法律理论的发展和演变,以及由此产生的后果,本文强调了如何以及为什么从“古典形式主义”模式向更加畸形的模式的转变。论文还说明了如何矫正变形和“相应的确定性丧失”,以便提供更大的“现实性”和外部性,同时仍然达到不可思议的一致性水平。旨在探索 udclassical形式主义和畸形模型的适用性的发展和努力,应被视为“建立术语 udconsistency的努力,以及对决策,udud决策的原则,概念和规则的探索。 “ udUnity”以及“人类普通法”是仍然能够实现的目标即使发生了法律的零散,多样化和多元化的情况。这样的非专业化过程,相应地由适当的一般性水平和 ududable的规则来抵制–使得它们在类似情况下被一致地应用,能够实现更公平,公正和统一的目标,而不是仅为了实现法律确定性而努力的模型。在泛化超过了所需限制的情况下,超越法律理论的边界确实可以提供急需的纠正。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ojo Mariane.B.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号