首页> 外文OA文献 >Social Construction of False Necessities and the Material Basis of Socio-Legal Power: A Reply to Irrationalism in Critical Legal Studies Critiques Identifying Latent Social Violence as a Potential New Material Foundation for Systematic Socio-Legal Theory
【2h】

Social Construction of False Necessities and the Material Basis of Socio-Legal Power: A Reply to Irrationalism in Critical Legal Studies Critiques Identifying Latent Social Violence as a Potential New Material Foundation for Systematic Socio-Legal Theory

机译:虚假必需品的社会建构和社会法律权力的物质基础:批判法律研究批判中的非理性主义批判认为潜在的社会暴力是系统性社会法律理论的潜在新物质基础

摘要

This Article is deliberately unconventional and exploratory. It begins by raising many conceptually problematic questions which cannot be answered simply or definitively. The point is not to provide any one right answer for these questions but to raise possible directions for new lines of inquiry rather than accepting the theoretical dead end that is irrationalism. I do not necessarily hope to offer a new systemizing theory that can withstand rigorous critique, but rather to show that such attempts remain possible and worthwhile even after the influence of post-modernism and the deconstruction of the most significant social theories.
机译:本条故意是非常规的和探索性的。它首先提出了许多在概念上有问题的问题,这些问题无法简单或确定地回答。关键不是要为这些问题提供一个正确的答案,而是要提出新的探究路线的可能方向,而不是接受理论上的非理性主义的死胡同。我不一定希望提供一种可以经受严厉批评的新的系统化理论,而是要表明即使在后现代主义的影响和最重要的社会理论的解构之后,这种尝试仍然是可能的,也是值得的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Godwin Samantha;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号