首页> 外文OA文献 >Les dépôts de palets et de disques en schiste du Néolithique ancien : des stocks de produits semi-ouvrés ? Oui, mais encore ? (Précisions pratiques avec le savoir-faire ancestral des fendeurs manuels d'ardoise dans les Massifs armoricain et ardennais)
【2h】

Les dépôts de palets et de disques en schiste du Néolithique ancien : des stocks de produits semi-ouvrés ? Oui, mais encore ? (Précisions pratiques avec le savoir-faire ancestral des fendeurs manuels d'ardoise dans les Massifs armoricain et ardennais)

机译:新石器时代的旧页岩盘和盘状沉积物:半成品库存?是的,但是还是吗? (在Armorican和Ardennes地块中使用手动板岩砍骨刀的祖传知识的实用细节)

摘要

Ethnographic comparatism is now a classical tool in attempts to clarify prehistoric populations’ patterns of stone-cutting. Without looking for other technical cultures throughout the world, the archaism of the manual production of roofing slates, more or less patent in France until the nineteenth or twentieth century in the slate quarries in the Armorican and Ardennes massifs, becomes a way to improve understanding of the laborious making of slate schist rings by the first Bliquy/ Villeneuve-Saint-Germain craftsmen in the fifth millennium BC. The comparison is all the more interesting in that some of the Neolithic and contemporary slate schist probably comes from the same outcrops, simply quarried from different depths, so their qualities differ but not their properties. The same goes for the historical development of slate-splitting manual tools which is more the result of the metallic transformation of parts of the instruments than the emergence of new types of tools, always used by thrown and posed percussion. It is thus quite possible that, splitting and knapping slate schist in the same way by means of equally rudimentary techniques, craftsmen of each age and area reached very similar technological answers. That implies comparing grouped finds of Neolithic discs and «quoits» with traditional slate-splitters’ stocks, although without really knowing the modes of storage, due to lack of archaeological indications with good reason, when we see the simple and precarious empirical practices used by the roofing slate-splitters to retain the required degree of humidity in their slabs of slate…
机译:现在,人种学比较是试图弄清史前人群切石方式的经典工具。无需在世界范围内寻找其他技术文化,手工生产屋顶板岩的陈旧性(一种或多或少的法国专利直到19世纪或20世纪在Armorican和Ardennes地块的板岩采石场就已成为一种方法)可以增进人们对公元前五千年的第一位Bliquy / Villeneuve-Saint-Germain工匠费力地制作了板岩片岩环。比较起来更有趣,因为一些新石器时代和当代板岩片岩可能来自同一露头,只是从不同深度采出,因此它们的质量不同,但特性不同。板岩劈裂手动工具的历史发展也是如此,这更多是由于对乐器零件进行了金属改造,而不是出现了经常被抛掷和摆锤使用的新型工具。因此,很有可能的是,通过同样的基本技术,以相同的方式分裂和绑扎板岩片岩,每个年龄和地区的工匠都获得了非常相似的技术答案。这意味着将新石器时代的圆盘和“码头”的成组发现与传统的板岩分裂者的存量进行比较,尽管并没有真正知道其存储方式,因为缺乏考古学证据并有充分的理由,当我们看到古希腊人使用的简单而不稳定的经验方法时屋顶板岩分离机在板岩板上保持所需的湿度...

著录项

  • 作者

    Eric Gaumé;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fre
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号