• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >The standard model, the maximalists and the minimalists : new interpretations of Trypillia mega-sites.
【2h】

The standard model, the maximalists and the minimalists : new interpretations of Trypillia mega-sites.

机译：标准模型，极简主义者和极简主义者：Trypillia巨型场所的新解释。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The currently prevailing view of the Trypillia mega-sites of the fourth millennium BC has been the dominant model for over 40 years: they were extra-large settlement examples of the Childean ‘Neolithic package’ of permanent settlement, domesticated plants and animals, and artifact assemblages containing polished stone tools and pottery. Trypillia mega-sites have therefore been viewed as permanent, long-term settlements comprising many thousands of people. This view of these extraordinary sites has been identical whatever the various opinions on their urban or other status. In recent mega-site publications, a maximalist gloss has been put on this standard view—with population estimates as high as 46,000 people (Rassmann et al. in J Neolit Archaeol 16: 96–134, 2014). However, doubts about the standard view have been emerging over the past two decades. As a result of the last six years’ intensive investigations, a tipping point has been reached, with as many as nine lines of independent evidence combining to create such doubts that the only logical response is to replace the standard model (not to mention the maximalist model) with a version of the minimalist model that envisions a less permanent, more seasonal settlement mode, or a smaller permanent settlement involving coeval dwelling of far fewer people (the ‘middle way’). In this article, I seek to construct an evidential basis for the alternatives to the standard view of Trypillia mega-sites.
机译：在公元前四千年的Trypillia巨型遗址中，目前流行的观点已成为40多年来的主要模型：它们是永久定居，驯化的动植物和人工制品的Childean“新石器一揽子计划”的超大定居实例。包含抛光石工具和陶器的组合。因此，Trypillia巨型遗址被视为包含数千人的永久性长期定居点。无论对城市或其他地位的各种看法如何，对这些非凡遗址的看法都是相同的。在最近的大型站点出版物中，这种标准的观点被赋予了极大的色彩-人口估计高达46,000人（Rassmann等人，《新里昂考古学报》 16：96–134，2014）。但是，过去二十年来，人们对标准观点产生了怀疑。经过近六年的深入研究，已经达到了一个转折点，多达九行独立证据相结合产生了这样的怀疑，即唯一合乎逻辑的回应就是要取代标准模型（更不用说最大化论者了）。模型）的版本，该模型设想了一种永久性较低的，季节性更多的定居模式，或者涉及涉及人数少得多的近代人居住的较小的永久性定居（“中间方式”）。在本文中，我试图为Trypillia巨型站点的标准视图的替代方法构建证据基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chapman John;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号