首页> 外文OA文献 >Empathy and teamwork: reflections on the legacy of Claudio Ciborra through the phenomenology of Edith Stein
【2h】

Empathy and teamwork: reflections on the legacy of Claudio Ciborra through the phenomenology of Edith Stein

机译:换位思考和团队合作:通过伊迪丝·斯坦的现象学思考克劳迪奥·西博拉的遗产

摘要

Claudio Ciborra argued that the position of information and communications technology (ICT) in organisations requires a shift from the present focus on the scientific paradigm to an alternative centre of gravity: human existence in everyday life. The paper proposes to make a contribution by examining the role of empathy in relationships among people working in industrial teams. Relevance is addressed by means of empirical evidence that emerged during interviews carried out in the longitudinal case-study of a supply chain transformation initiative in American Power Conversion (APC) Ireland. Rigour is applied by building on the legacy of Ciborra viewed through the lens of the phenomenology of Edith Stein which was developed during her doctoral studies as a student of Edmund Husserl. Furthermore it is proposed that Stein's philosophy of empathy can provide a theoretical framework for the understanding of organizations, teamwork and information systems. The concept can also provide impetus for future work in the area of human computer interaction (HCI) that is increasingly being employed in automated business transactions. In addition, it is suggested that Husserl's proposition that an objective external world can only be experienced inter-subjectively has the potential to contribute some new insights to the present impasse within the positivist-interpretivist debate.
机译:克劳迪奥·西博拉(Claudio Ciborra)认为,信息和通信技术(ICT)在组织中的地位需要从目前对科学范式的关注转向另一种重心:人类在日常生活中的存在。本文建议通过研究同情在产业团队中工作人员之间的关系中做出的贡献。相关性是通过在爱尔兰美国电力转换公司(APC)进行的供应链转型计划纵向案例研究中进行的访谈中得出的经验证据来解决的。 Rigor的运用是依托伊迪丝·斯坦因现象学的视角来研究Ciborra的遗产,伊迪丝·斯坦因是在埃德蒙·胡塞尔(Edmund Husserl)的学生期间攻读博士学位的。此外,有人提出斯坦因的移情哲学可以为理解组织,团队合作和信息系统提供理论框架。该概念还可以为在自动化业务交易中越来越多地采用的人机交互(HCI)领域的未来工作提供动力。另外,有人建议,胡塞尔关于客观外部世界只能在主体间进行体验的主张有可能为实证主义-解释主义辩论中的当前僵局贡献一些新见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号