首页> 外文OA文献 >Neo-traditional, volcanic pozzolan-lime mortars for the repair of historic structures
【2h】

Neo-traditional, volcanic pozzolan-lime mortars for the repair of historic structures

机译:用于修复历史建筑的新传统火山灰石灰砂浆

摘要

The object of this research is to examine the possibilities of using naturally occurring volcanic pozzolans in lime-cement mortars for the repair of historic structures. Water vapor transmissivity, tensile splitting strength and set time are crucial performance criteria for historic repair mortars. Mortars samples were prepared from three different pozzolans: ground pozzolana from Pozzuoli, Italy; ground Rhenish trass from Andernach, Germany; and ground ash from Mount St. Helens in Washington State. The samples were tested by Vicat apparatus (per ASTM C807) during their initial set to gauge pozzolanic activity levels. After a curing period, the samples were tested for rate of water vapor transmission (per ASTM E96) as well as subjected to tensile strength testing (per ASTM D3967). The resultant data was compared to that of control mortar samples made of portland cement and lime, comparable to ASTM 'Type N' and 'Type O' mortars commonly used in repair of historic structures. While this research is specifically tailored to examine the applicability of using pozzolans in mortars for repair of historic structures (especially those near water or in areas of high humidity), its findings are also pertinent in a wider context to the concrete and construction industries, in particular with regards to the burgeoning field of 'green' or environmentally friendly materials. This thesis concludes that it is possible to formulate repair mortars using volcanic pozzolans and lime that exhibit qualities that make them suitable for a wide range of historic repair scenarios.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究在石灰水泥砂浆中使用天然火山灰来修复历史建筑的可能性。水蒸气透过率,抗拉裂强度和凝固时间是历史性修补砂浆的关键性能标准。砂浆样品是从三种不同的火山灰制备的:意大利Pozzuoli的地面火山灰;来自德国安德纳赫的Rhenish trass地面;和华盛顿州圣海伦斯山的碎灰。在初始设置期间,通过Vicat仪器(根据ASTM C807)对样品进行测试,以测量火山灰活性水平。固化一段时间后,测试样品的水蒸气透过率(根据ASTM E96),并进行拉伸强度测试(根据ASTM D3967)。将所得数据与由硅酸盐水泥和石灰制成的对照砂浆样品的数据进行比较,可与通常用于修复历史建筑的ASTM“ N型”和“ O型”砂浆相媲美。尽管这项研究是专门针对检查在灰浆中使用火山灰修复历史建筑(尤其是靠近水或高湿度区域的建筑)的适用性而进行的,但它的发现在更广泛的背景下也与混凝土和建筑行业相关。特别是在新兴的“绿色”或环保材料领域。本文的结论是,可以使用火山灰和石灰配制修补砂浆,这些砂浆具有足以使其适用于各种历史性修补场景的质量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Baragona Anthony John;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号