首页> 外文OA文献 >We should be cautious about televising trials as they would do little to bolster public faith in the judicial system and provide for open justice: alternative solutions should be sought
【2h】

We should be cautious about televising trials as they would do little to bolster public faith in the judicial system and provide for open justice: alternative solutions should be sought

机译:我们应该对电视转播的电视节目保持谨慎,因为它们不会增强公众对司法系统的信心并提供公开司法服务:应寻求替代解决方案

摘要

The recent spate and profile of super-injunctions has once again opened up the debate over whether to televise courtroom proceedings. Arguments have been made that such a development would serve to bolster public confidence in the judicial system and would represent a clear manifestation of the principle of open justice. However, Emmanuel Melissaris urges caution and suggests that such benefits are not at all clear and the execution of justice could be complicated by such a change.
机译:超级禁令的最近出现和引起人们的关注,再次引发了有关是否电视转播法庭诉讼程序的辩论。有人认为,这种事态发展将有助于增强公众对司法系统的信心,并将清楚地体现开放司法原则。但是,伊曼纽尔·梅利萨里斯(Emmanuel Melissaris)敦促谨慎行事,并指出这种好处根本不明确,而这种改变可能会使司法的执行变得复杂。

著录项

  • 作者

    Melissaris Emmanuel;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号