• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Logic of belief and the content of God: Hans Frei’s theological grammar
【2h】

Logic of belief and the content of God: Hans Frei’s theological grammar

机译：信仰的逻辑和上帝的内容：汉斯·弗莱（Hans Frei）的神学语法

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This thesis offers a systematic engagement with the theological hermeneutics of HansudFrei. The two key conceptual categories are “the logic of belief” and “the content ofudGod”.udThe former refers to the grammatical ordering of theological statements: Frei isudconcerned to distinguish grammatical logic from ontology, and to establish the actualudstarting point for any given theological enterprise. Frei’s own preference for a “linear”udand “cumulative” method built upon the starting point of a realistic narrative readingudof the gospels is unpacked and explored.udThe second category, “the content of God”, refers to Frei’s search for an account inudwhich God has actual reality, as opposed to a mere metaphysical abstraction. Indeed,udfor Frei, the arrival – or failure to arrive – at a ‘concrete’ account of God is the test ofudany theological starting point, as evidenced in the ability or otherwise to do exegeticaludjustice to the narrative shape of the crucifixion-resurrection sequence. The thesisuddemonstrates that for Frei, the starting point in the logic of belief must be the identityudof Jesus Christ as revealed in scripture, and only on that basis can a concrete contentudof God be posited.udIn so doing, the intention is to set Frei very firmly within his mid-twentieth centuryudcontext, in particular his engagement with and ultimate rejection of existentialist andudNeo-orthodox theology. Accordingly, the thesis traces the development in Frei’sudthinking of these two conceptual categories, from his doctoral thesis on Barth’s earlyudtheology up to and including his twin publications, The Eclipse of Biblical Narrativeud(1974) and The Identity of Jesus Christ (1975). Later works by Frei are alsoudconsidered in relation to these.udThe thesis does not stop at the mid-twentieth century, but illustrates the continuedudrelevance of Frei’s hermeneutical theology into this century, putting him inudconversation with a number of systematic and biblical theologians. Suggestions areudmade as to his applicability to modern theological concerns, including the debateudsurrounding the being and action of God: a field where he has yet to be deployedudsuccessfully.
机译：本文为汉斯·弗雷德的神学解释学提供了系统的论述。这两个关键的概念类别是“信仰的逻辑”和“神的内容”。 ud前者指的是神学陈述的语法顺序：弗雷（Frei）不关心区分语法逻辑和本体论，并建立实际的任何给定的神学事业的起点。弗雷自己偏爱建立在对福音的现实叙述阅读的起点上的“线性”，“ ud”和“累计”方法。 ud第二类，“上帝的内容”，指的是弗雷在寻找上帝所具有的真实存在的描述，而不是纯粹的形而上学的抽象。确实，对于弗雷来说，对上帝的“具体”解释的到达或失败，都是对 udany神学起点的考验，这证明了他有能力或以其他方式对圣经的叙事形式进行诠释/不公正。被钉十字架复活的顺序。论文证明，对于弗雷而言，信仰逻辑的出发点必须是圣经中所揭示的耶稣基督的身份 ud，并且只有在此基础上，才能假定上帝的具体内容 ud。目的是使弗赖在他的二十世纪中期 ud上下文中，尤其是他对存在主义和 ud新正统神学的参与和最终拒绝，牢牢地把握住他。因此，论文追踪了弗莱对这两个概念类别的理解，从他关于巴特早期神学的博士论文到他的双胞胎出版物《圣经叙事的日蚀》（1974）和《耶稣基督的身份》，都包括在内。 （1975）。弗雷的后来作品也对此有所考虑。 ud本文的研究并没有停止于二十世纪中叶，而是说明了弗雷的诠释学神学在本世纪中的持续无意义，从而使他与许多系统的论证进行了对话。和圣经的神学家。关于他对现代神学问题的适用性的建议，包括对上帝的存在和行为的辩论，辩论：围绕上帝的存在和行动：他尚未被成功部署的领域。

著录项

  • 作者

    Henderson Frances Munro;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号