首页> 外文OA文献 >Green printing technologies versus traditional printing technologies in sheet-fed offset lithography
【2h】

Green printing technologies versus traditional printing technologies in sheet-fed offset lithography

机译:单张胶印平版印刷中的绿色印刷技术与传统印刷技术的比较

摘要

This experimental study compares green printing technologies (ink and stock) to traditional printing technologies (ink and stock) regarding how they compare in quality. The quality was measured using the print characteristics of gray balance and dot gain. A comparison of the two independent variables (ink and stock) was conducted to determine if a difference exists for the selected characteristics. It has been suggested that the green technologies, despite being more environmentally friendly, are not as high in quality and therefore result in a lower quality printed piece. This research used a four-color test form that was printed using both the green and traditional technologies. The characteristics were measured using an X-rite 528 spectrodensitometer, after which the data were analyzed and conclusions reported. The results of the study suggest that there is no practical significance between the different inks and stocks employed in this study. It was determined however that the best print quality in terms of dot gain (meaning the least amount of dot gain) resulted from the combination of green technologies (ink and paper).
机译:这项实验研究将绿色印刷技术(墨水和原纸)与传统印刷技术(墨水和原纸)进行质量比较。使用灰度平衡和点增益的打印特性测量质量。对两个自变量(墨水和纸张)进行比较,以确定所选特性是否存在差异。已经提出,尽管绿色技术对环境更友好,但其质量却不那么高,因此导致印刷品的质量较低。这项研究使用了四色测试表格,该表格使用了绿色和传统技术印刷而成。使用X-rite 528分光光度计测量特性,然后分析数据并报告结论。研究结果表明,在本研究中使用的不同油墨和涂料之间没有实际意义。但是,据确定,以点增益(意味着最小的点增益)为单位的最佳打印质量是绿色技术(墨水和纸张)的组合所产生的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Calkins Celeste M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号