首页> 外文OA文献 >The role of post-disaster institutions in recovery and resilience: a comparative study of three recent disasters – Victorian Bushfires (2009), Queensland Floods (2010-11), and Canterbury Earthquakes (2010-12)
【2h】

The role of post-disaster institutions in recovery and resilience: a comparative study of three recent disasters – Victorian Bushfires (2009), Queensland Floods (2010-11), and Canterbury Earthquakes (2010-12)

机译:灾后机构在恢复和复原方面的作用:对最近三次灾难的比较研究 - 维多利亚州森林大火(2009年),昆士兰洪水(2010-11)和坎特伯雷地震(2010-12)

摘要

This paper addresses the fourth area of disaster management: recovery and resilience. Disasters are focusing events that can drive immediate policy change. It argues that good recovery institutions provide the adaptive capacity that enables communities to recover from natural disasters. This paper briefly describes recovery processes after three natural disasters in Australia and New Zealand between 2009 and 2011: bushfires in Victoria in 2009, flooding in Queensland from 2010-2011 and earthquakes in the Canterbury region from 2010.These cases demonstrate the importance of flexible governance arrangements. This is shown through the choice of recovery institution, evidence of institutional learning before and after disasters, the role of community engagement, response to insurance issues, and the building of resilience. Particularly important for resilience is the building of relationships between recovery institutions and local governments and communities.
机译:本文介绍了灾难管理的第四个领域:恢复和弹性。灾难是关注焦点的事件,这些事件可能会导致立即更改政策。它认为,好的恢复机构可以提供使社区从自然灾害中恢复的适应能力。本文简要介绍了2009年至2011年澳大利亚和新西兰发生三场自然灾害后的恢复过程:2009年维多利亚州的森林大火,2010-2011年昆士兰州的洪灾以及2010年坎特伯雷地区的地震,这些案例表明了灵活治理的重要性安排。通过选择恢复机构,灾难前后的机构学习证据,社区参与的作用,对保险问题的响应以及复原力的构建,可以证明这一点。对于恢复力特别重要的是在恢复机构与地方政府和社区之间建立关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    James Smart;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号