首页> 外文OA文献 >Entry deterrence in banking: the role of cost asymmetry and adverse selection
【2h】

Entry deterrence in banking: the role of cost asymmetry and adverse selection

机译:银行业的进入威慑:成本不对称和逆向选择的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AbstractIn this paper, we review and explore the strategic mechanisms that deter entry in banking. The literature relies on externality between banks to generate entry deterrence. Typically, the externality generated is caused by differential adverse selection faced by incumbents and entrants. In this paper it is shown that adverse selection problem between a bank and its borrowers is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for entry deterrence. We show that cost asymmetry between different types of incumbents and private information about costs can generate conditional entry deterrence. This source of externality can cause entry deterrence just as other types of externalities created by differential adverse selection. Forward contracts can act as signaling device for incumbent costs. Incorporating adverse selection problem in the credit market in fact relaxes entry conditions: entry can take place even if the incumbent is of strong type and can signal credibly.
机译:摘要在本文中,我们回顾并探索了阻止进入银行业的战略机制。文献依靠银行之间的外部性来产生进入威慑力。通常,产生的外部性是由在位者和进入者面临的差异性逆向选择引起的。本文表明,银行与其借款人之间的逆向选择问题既不是进入威慑的必要条件,也不是充分条件。我们表明,不同类型的在位者和有关成本的私人信息之间的成本不对称会产生有条件的进入威慑力。正如由差异逆向选择产生的其他类型的外部性一样,这种外部性的源头可能导致进入威慑。远期合约可以作为承担现有成本的信号装置。实际上,将逆向选择问题纳入信贷市场实际上会放宽准入条件:即使在位者是强势型人,也可以可靠地发出信号,准入仍可能发生。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mallick Indrajit;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号