• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Ethics governance, modernity and human beings' capacity to reflect and decide---a genealogy of medical research ethics in the UK and Singapore.
【2h】

Ethics governance, modernity and human beings' capacity to reflect and decide---a genealogy of medical research ethics in the UK and Singapore.

机译：道德治理，现代性和人类反映和决定的能力---英国和新加坡医学研究伦理的谱系。

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This PhD thesis explores how bioethics has reconfigured the way we think about, discuss and govern the scientific and medical use of the human body in the UK and Singapore. The thesis starts by analysing the language, knowledge, institutions and mechanisms that allowed people to render intelligible and organise the medical use of the human body before the emergence of bioethics. Then, drawing on the work of Michel Foucault, Ian Hacking and Nikolas Rose, the thesis examines and compares the conceptual, material and political conditions that made it possible, in both the UK and Singapore, to identify the medical use of human tissue as a 'problem of ethics' needing to be assessed and regulated. The thesis furthermore discusses a key component of bioethics - the procedure of informed consent - and analyzes how its use is reconfiguring subjectivities and contemporary notions of citizenship in both countries. On the basis of a systematic content analysis of key bioethics' journals from 1960 to the present and over twenty in-depth interviews with key experts in the field, the thesis makes two important findings. First, it explains how, in the UK, bioethical governance was developed to protect human beings from the dangers of modern science, while in Singapore it was introduced as part of the country's drive to be a modern and developed nation. Second, it argues that bioethical governance has brought into being, through its language, categories, procedures and experts, a new figure of the subject and citizen: the human being capable of reflecting and deciding on his or her own existence. These findings make an original contribution to (1) the sociological study of bioethics and the bioethical governance of the life sciences and (2) the literature on govern-mentality.
机译：本博士论文探讨了生物伦理学如何重新构造了我们在英国和新加坡思考，讨论和管理人体科学和医学用途的方式。本论文首先分析了语言，知识，制度和机制，这些语言，知识，机制和机制使人们能够理解并在生物伦理学出现之前组织对人体的医疗用途。然后，借鉴米歇尔·福柯，伊恩·哈金和尼古拉斯·罗斯的著作，本文研究并比较了在英国和新加坡使人体组织在医学上的应用成为可能的概念，物质和政治条件。需要评估和规范“道德问题”。本文进一步讨论了生物伦理学的关键组成部分-知情同意程序-并分析了其使用如何重新构筑了两国的主观性和当代公民意识。在对1960年至今的主要生物伦理学期刊进行系统的内容分析，并对该领域的主要专家进行了20多次深入访谈的基础上，本文得出了两个重要发现。首先，它解释了在英国如何开发生物伦理治理来保护人类免受现代科学的危害，而在新加坡则将其引入作为该国成为现代化发达国家的一部分。其次，它认为，生物伦理治理通过其语言，类别，程序和专家而形成了一个新的主题和公民形象：人类能够反思和决定自己的生存方式。这些发现为（1）生命科学的生物伦理学和生命伦理治理的社会学研究，以及（2）关于治理心理的文献做出了原始贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Reubi David;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号